I used to think it was Garland. I still think it looks like Garland, but the crystal and the bonus art changed my mind. I also think the confusion is all Amano's fault. If the cutscene featured a fat Italian plumber with blue overalls and a red shirt and hat with a big M on it, and Amano drew this character and labelled it "light warrior" we'd have half the population saying the FF1 cutscene featured Mario. The truth is, regardless of what Square Enix intended, they have the warrior depicted as Garland. I'll give you that it's labelled as light warrior, and light warrior is how I'll refer to this character, but the knight with a two horned helmet and purple armor is Garland, and the knight with red armor and a visor style minimal helm is the lightwarrior. My oppinion is that Amano and SE screwed up. They could depict Garland, Mario, Luigi, it doesn't matter, only the label makes it a light warrior.