An interesting inconsistency.

[Pharoh Amon Khan III]

No, you didn't. An explanation of the way things could possibly have worked is not, and has never been, proof.

E=MC2 ring a bell? Anyway, c'mon people... That's like trying to prove Time Compression. How does that work? All anyone can start off with is "Well, I suppose..."

I say, give it a fair chance.

[Ryushikaze]

E=MC^2 isn't proof, or more properly said, is not evidence.

And we've been GIVING him a fair chance. He's been wasting that chance for awhile.

And FE, Laguna taking a different path is NOT evidence of possesion of any sort, much less the kind you claim, which, by the way, you HAVE YET TO PROVIDE ANY EVIDENCE FOR.

[Future Esthar]

much less the kind you claim, which, by the way, you HAVE YET TO PROVIDE ANY EVIDENCE FOR.

It makes sense.Note that this is not a game event but the explanation of some mechanics so logic is enough.

Proof that Laguna understand there is someone but don´t understand what it says:

QUOTE-I know there is something here but I don´t know what it says.

[Ryushikaze]

It makes sense.Note that this is not a game event but the explanation of some mechanics so logic is enough.

Except that logic is NOT enough to say "this mechanism applies here", either in the real world or under suspension of disbelief.

Proof that Laguna understand there is someone but don´t understand what it says:

QUOTE-I know there is something here but I don´t know what it says.

Which is completely irrelevant to "Huh, I brainfarted" somehow equalling mind control.

[MJN SEIFER]

Where did that happen?

I can't remember the descusion but it's after the 3rd dream where Laguna and co try a bit of acting. (The dream is a birth of a theory of mine actually)