Results 1 to 15 of 215

Thread: Explanation on the R=U theory?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I have one matching sock PhoenixAsh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    1,495

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by boys from the dwarf View Post
    here is some proof that rinoa is not ultimecia (sorry if someone has already said that.) ultimecia tries to kill rinoa by sending her into space but squall saves her. ultimecia killing herself just makes no sense. it would rewrites history means edea never becomes a sorceress. this is all so confusing. time is one of the most confusing things ever!
    Actually if anything (though I donit think it does, so I doubt I'd try and use it), that scene SUPPORTS R=U. Rinoa doesn't die, so there is no paradox, meaning no argument against R=U. Furthermore the ridiculously low probability of what happens with Squall saving her almost points to the event being fate, Rinoa COULDN'T die, which is exactly what R=U states.

    EDIT: Lilliputian Hitcher I would agree. If one were trying to argue what the canon story was, then R=U seems very unlikely due to Ultimania. Taking the game itself as an isolated story, with all its gaps left to be filled, R=U IMHO becomes a quite plausible, and attractive way of filling them.
    Last edited by PhoenixAsh; 08-16-2006 at 02:47 PM.

    I say what I think. If you disagree, then that is up to you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •