What I meant in my questioning is not the validity of the 'interpetation' but this was the immediate response for those that had just beaten the game. All had a different interpertation more or less like the ones I mentioned.
It was like the multiple interpetation of the ending of FFVII. Everyone had 'theories' but the bottomline is they were looking for solidity in their interpetation of the ending with like-minded people. And when questioned by their belief some willingly accepted the new ideals, while others stead-fast rejected them and found clues and 'facts' to hold their ground.
Most who are vehemtly against the R=U theory seem to not have the same views on how the story ended, but just that R=U is... to put it bluntly: Blashphemy.
Almost like "Virginia" trying to find proof that is a Santa Claus...
Let me give an personal example:
I never saw "Passion of the Christ". I felt I didn't need to. Most of the people I met that had seen it, repeated every word I had heard before. "It will change you life."; "The Jews Murdered Christ!", and on on... My reaction to the statement of 'murder' had me respond with..
"The Jew's did not murder Christ." I was often met with confusion or rejection with that statement, but I continued. "Technically it happened the way it was suppose to have happened. How else did you want him to die for your sins?"
Now my point is... Is that I just changed their general interpetation of a movie... Some were angered and accused me of atheism; others were so taken 'out of their box' or 'unplugged' that they stopped and thought turning away the general concensus and regaining individual thought again... I wondered why the anger versus the calm?
Please... Tell me.... What was your interpetation of the ending?




