Congratulations, you've just won the idiot of the month award. Sorry, but claiming that everything that someone else has posted is BS, without evidence, does not make you right. Quite the opposite, it makes you an moronic stubborn jack@$$ who is unable to formulate a logical reply and must thus stick to petty insults. In fact, such a response, from someone who apparently didn't even bother to read the post he was responding to, makes me wonder if there is any point to going on with this at all.Originally Posted by Pharoh Amon Khan III
Somehow I knew that would draw you out... And everything you just said is... well... B.S. There's no 'evidence' and Yeah... Rinoa still COULD be Ultimecia... That's it. No matter what you say or whatever "facts" you come up with you can't change my or anyone's mind. There's not sense in me explaining it to you because you're always gonna just called it a 'postulate' or whatever...
You and your's treat this as if it should not even be spoken about, like it's 'against the law'.
Why is that?
Now, you can keep spouting all you want... I've heard it all before... For once SOMEONE is going to post their beliefs about the R=U and admit that there is NOTHING you and yours can do... You can't stop me and mine from thinking, believeing or whatever about no more than a Christian can 'convert' a devout Muslim.
So sit back... flip through your thesaurus... Cuz, it's on...
Mommy put the kids to bed and break out the "His" and "Hers" paddles, DADDY'S HOME!!! (It's a new quote I'm working on. Just tryin' it out)
The reason we hate hearing about it, is because we have yet to hear a single, coherent, logical explanation that would explain why the R-U theory could possibly be true.
In order to have a theory which anyone will be willing to listen to, you must have one that can find a way around these facts:
1. Ultimecia lives many generations in the future.
2. Square explicitly stated that the lifespan of a sorceress is no longer than that of an average human.
Every R=U theory ever presented, even before Square gave us the second fact I listed and made the theory completely impossible, has made a great series of assumptions to support their theory (and yours is no different). And, quite frankly, that is enough to ruin the theory right there. When presenting a theory, the burden of proof lies with the person formulating the theory. The more assumptions your theory makes, the less acceptable it is. Prove your theory with quotes and canon evidence. Otherwise, we will continue to ridicule you, for you will be continuing to be deserving of that ridicule.
