Quote Originally Posted by PhoenixAsh View Post
finalfantasyguy4ever we have already discussed that it is perfectly possible to debate whether or not one can hold that the game suggests R=U without holding that R=U is cannon when everything else is considered. If you do not wish to take part in such a discussion, then no one will force you. If you do wish to take part, then please offer further reasons for your opinion of why R=U is wrong (those you offered earlier were fairly well refuted IMHO).
I don't want this thread to stay off topic, so I'm only posting this because it summarizes earlier discussion of the scope of an R=U debate, and thus is of assistance to people who haven't read the whole thread. This thread is discussing whether or not R=U stands up from the evidence in the game (perhaps some might defend it fuller than that, but I haven't seen such an attempt), and also if, and if so the reason why, the theory and its proponents get unfairly persecuted.

EDIT: perhaps that was a little too limited, I apologise to anyone (particularly the original poster) who feels that the thread has other purposes, that just how I've interpretted it.