You're going to have to back up this claim, because as far as I see it, logical and rational reasoning can allow us to determine top a fairly large extent what is "true or false".Originally Posted by Wilder
That's true, but this is a rational debate, not a simple "sharing of interpretations", and as such, any interpretation that is to be considered valid MUST be logically justifiable. If you don't actually have any arguments for R=U besides "it's just my interpretation" than that's fine, but it does not in any way make R=U generally valid in any way.this is a matter of interpretation, and each one of us can have our own, ask the guy that think quisitis is ultimecia.
Oh really? Take a look at the Ultimania again:About the ultimania guide, there is a lot of contradicition in the game about that, beginning with " a witch should pass his powers to die" and showing the process with ultimecia, but this inmortality issue is confusing, can she die for aging ? or she must be killed with a silver sword ? there is vague information about that , so , a lot of official information that contradict each other, and the rest of it is interpretation of hairs colors. inmortality , time compression yeah ! , easy topics.
Doesn't sound very confusing to me. It's stated black on white with no ambiguity whatsoever. Not vague at all.Originally Posted by Square-Enix




