I think I'll wait (hope) until rationality once again restores itself to this thread before contributing much in the way of argument. I will say though Wilder, that although I defend R=U's plausibility, one can not simply assume that it can not be found to be true or false. Unfortunately, as with many theories, it would be far easier to prove it false than true, I just don't think such a thing has been acheived (nor do I think it has been shown to be massively unlikely).
finalfantasyguy4ever why do you insist on repeatedly posting short, unfounded, and largely off topic posts? You have set up your own thread about Q=U for whatever reason you had, why feel the need to post your idea here? People are enjoying this thread, and although you may not like R=U, it thread is not being forced on you. If you don't like the thread, why try and spoil it for others?
