Addressing his last post to me...

Quote Originally Posted by Pharoh Amon Khan III View Post
If it weren't for the threat of being banned I would call you a Biyatch right now, only because that's all you're doin' right now: B***ing! Oh wait, I guess I sorta did go there... Oh well... Excuse me Mods... I plead for a warning... Otherwise... Please consult with me in PM. Thank you.
I'm the one actually addressing the argument, and not the man making it.

All you're doin is slicing and dicing things that I say to make yourself look smart. You're not even including my full statements.
The snipped portions were deemed irrelevant. At least I mentioned they were snipped. If you feel like I didn't address something, tell me what it is, and I'll see about giving it a go.

I already said that I wasn't serious about this and that this was just thoughts that crossed my mind and it wasn't anything to be put as 'proof'.
Never said it was. Why does this stop me from commenting on it?

But you just took it that way and played the role of the 'holier than thou'.
Addressing the validity of your ramblings is acting holier than thou?

Dude, it's just fantasy. There's no need to take it this far or any further because the only landmark we're gonna reach is nowhere and ultimately 'closed and banned'.
Please stop touting this. One CAN rationally debate fantasy. People do it succesfully all the time. Now, if you continue, yes, we will reach nowhere, but I at the least, will not be banned.

I'm trying my best to state my beliefs without being 'biased' as most are but that's just not good enough for you, is it? (shakes head in sadness).
No. It's not. Belief without evidence is not acceptable, even if you somehow avoided a bias, which you actually haven't, since you refuse to allow your belief to be rationally analyzed.

For the love of Mike... You're really just gonna drag this down once again to this level to why these threads are closed aren't you?
I don't think it's MY level- the rational analysis- that gets these threads closed.

Well I won't be party to that. I'll just keep posting what I say and we'll see what happens, k? I could slice and dice your responses like you did mine but I don't see that worth my energy.
So you say, but never do. PAK, I have encountered many like you before. Blustering will not cut it. Put your money where your mouth is, or shut it.

You're really just being petty and that's it. I won't stoop to your level. Granted, there are little points to what you said, but most of it is just B.S. only because you don't see R=U as a possibility.
I see R=U as possible. I see I=U as almost equally as possible.

I see it as a possibility but not an absolute, and that's what I've always stated. It's not definite but a possibility. But yet, you still attack me and mine like we're spouting 'hersey'.
Because you're trying to get special pleading for a postulate that you claim is 'only a possibility'. Would you do the same for Z=U, or Q=U? I doubt it.

Kinda like Ramza Beovolve.
Don't compare yourself to Ramza. His 'heresy' was based on accumulated evidence. You, on the other hand, are arguing against all the evidence.

MOMMY PUT THE KIDS TO BED AND BREAK OUT THE LEATHER MASKS! DADDY'S HOME!!!! SECRET WORD IS: WHAT?! (Blame that one on Family Guy!)

P.S. "Honey" let's not fight in front of the kids, cuz that seems to be all you're doin'... Let's go somewhere private, k? (PM).
No. If you cannot conduct a debate in a method verifiable to all, do not hold it. The only reason to hold a hidden debate is so you can spin it. This way, in a public and recorded forum, any spin can be checked against the debate itself.

Now, continue, and avoid the meaningly pop culture references. It makes taking you seriously very difficult.