Quote Originally Posted by Shout View Post
Those two statements have nothing to do with eachother. Where are thinking of this? First I said most would say that influenced can't be beat the influence then you bring up two bands with the same roots. Where does all of this come into this? I'm trying to discuss a father-son type of thing and bring up son-son. Yeah they were both from the father but I never tried to compare them.
Because if someone thinks that Manic Street Preachers are better than Clash, it pretty much voids your entire arguement about a band never bettering their influence.

Quote Originally Posted by Shout View Post
How is this relevant at all? One statment was that you assumed I was assuming that the new generations gonna suck.
Because if your hypothesis doesn't work for the next generation, then why should it work for the previous generations?