i think you pretty much hit it on the head. what they are doing here would be criminal in itself, and alienates someone for something they haven't been proven as doing anything wrong. the law is largely based on witness testimony which is the problem, if you are accused of something, automatically people are going to think you did it, cause someone said you did, but that's where it should end. you shouldn't be LEGALLY affected unless undeniable proof is shown.

way too far, unjustifiable