Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 93

Thread: Can sony do one PS3 related thing without screwing up?

  1. #61
    This could be Dangerous! Carl the Llama's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,922
    Articles
    2
    Blog Entries
    6

    FFXIV Character

    Legendary Hero (Sargatanas)

    Default

    Joel, iv got to ask you this, do you know how much a Blu-Ray driver costs? I doubt it, my uncle (who makes computers, has a Blu-Ray Burner on his compuet spent $945 on that alone... that would probbly be why it is so expencive, IMO I think pay£600-800 is hugely worth the price tag considering what is inside the computer.

    Quote Originally Posted by PLAY
    Fears of the console's price were finally dashed at E3, when Sony revealed that the 60gb Playstation 3 will cost 599 (euro's)which altho translateing to £410 will mean that it will cost %425 in the UK. still, its a remarkbly cheap price tag to stick on the console. especially considering the demand for the console. Sony could have genuinely have announced tha it would cost £525, and everyone would still think it incredibly reasonable considering the technology inside the console. As we stated last issue, that with the Playstation 3 you are essentially getting a pice of hardware that, when you consider how much it is capable of, should be costing around £2000. It seems ridiculas to say such a thing, but bare in mind that your standared Blu-ray player currently retails at at just under £1000. The Playstation 3 is going to be launched at an unbelievably cheap price.
    BTW I cant link this information because i read it out of a magazine and as such i had to write it up by hand

  2. #62
    Will be banned again Roto13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    On the INTARWEB
    Posts
    14,570

    Default

    See, I don't even use my DVD player. I don't care about a blu ray player and I'm not going to spend all that extra money for one. I buy video game consoles to play (DUN DUN DUN-N-N-N-N-N!) video games. It might be incredibly cheap for all that it can do, but it's incredibly expensive for all that I would do with it.

  3. #63
    Brandon Stroud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    I'd be better off in Midgar...
    Posts
    114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dreddz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon Stroud View Post
    The fact that the system itself is currently slated to be marketed at DOUBLE the price
    Actually, $600/£425 is fair for what your getting.
    I think you misquoted me and completely missed the point of my post. Sure, considering what you get with the system, that's a fair price. However, I'm talking marketing strategy and overall analysis of the competition. What I'm talking about, here, is that the system itself is currently slated to be marketed at DOUBLE the price and less than HALF the supply/number of units compared to the Wii. I'm not trying to argue a point, here, btw. Just being sure to clarify my point.
    "Rules, much like bones, are made to be BROKEN. So long as they aren't your own, that is."

  4. #64
    Ominous Wanderer Tech Admin Samuraid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    5,522

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ~Reno~ View Post
    Joel, iv got to ask you this, do you know how much a Blu-Ray driver costs? I doubt it, my uncle (who makes computers, has a Blu-Ray Burner on his compuet spent $945 on that alone... that would probbly be why it is so expencive, IMO I think pay£600-800 is hugely worth the price tag considering what is inside the computer.

    BTW I cant link this information because i read it out of a magazine and as such i had to write it up by hand
    $945 is the cost as a consumer, not for the manufacturer. (Although $945 is too expensive anyway. $700 is more like it)
    The $200 to $300 is the estimated cost of how much it costs Sony to manufacture a Blu-ray drive; just the manufacturing costs, without all the consumer and resale markups and additions. I will say I have not verified if $200-$300 is actually accurate, I just know it certainly doesn't cost Sony $700 to make a BluRay drive.

  5. #65
    Original Gamer fantasyjunkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dreddz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Brandon Stroud View Post
    The fact that the system itself is currently slated to be marketed at DOUBLE the price
    Actually, $600/£425 is fair for what your getting.
    Maybe it is but I can't afford $600 and I bet theres' a lot of other people like me too. The gaming age is not just teenagers anymore. A lot of us are older and married too with bills!

  6. #66

    Default

    I only have one more thing to say on the PS3 issue, after this you guys can waste all of your hard earned gamer cash on this piece of crap.

    The PS3 launch is one of the worst launches I ever seen in a console. Ever! I've been around the block a few times, I've played and beaten thousands of video games in my lifetime, there is no way in hell the PS3 can last long unless the 3 has enough fanboys willing to waste their money on this.

    Confimred stuff that will probably at least give the PS3 a heavily shakey start.

    1. The console itself costs WAY too much. 500-600 dollars is just not worth one console. For 600 you can buy a Wii and an XBox 360 (since the Premium set will drop to about 350 by the time the Wii and PS3 come out) and still play fun games like Dead Rising, Dead or Alive 4, Halo 3 (around early 2007), Enchanted Arms, Zelda: Twilight Princess, Phantasy Star Universe, Super Mario Galaxies, Sonic and the Secret Rings (origionally called Sonic Wildfire) Sonic the Hedgehog 360, and Condemned Criminal Origions.

    2. The PS3's hardware has so much high end technology that companies hardly wanna make games for it due to it being to hard to write them for it, notice how only a few Japanese developers are sticking with it? Konami, Square, Capcom (possibly just for Devil May Cry 4)

    3. Quite possibly the biggest thing of all. A lack of interesting launch titles. Sure early on people were pissing themselves over Metal Gear Solid 4.. oh but WAIT! It's not a launch title? OMGWTF I WILL STILL BUY ONE LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!1111ONEELEVENsmurfRE! All the cool games that will at least be somewhat fun for the 3 won't be out till at least mid-late 2007.

    That's all I have to say on this subject, if you wanna accept it or deny it I don't really give two [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]s about it.

    Thank you, and good night.

  7. #67
    Mold Anus Old Manus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    cumree
    Posts
    14,731
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I've yet to see a Wii launch title that interests me either.


    there was a picture here

  8. #68
    ..a Russian mountain cat. Yamaneko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    15,927
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erdrick Holmes View Post
    1. The console itself costs WAY too much. 500-600 dollars is just not worth one console. For 600 you can buy a Wii and an XBox 360 (since the Premium set will drop to about 350 by the time the Wii and PS3 come out) and still play fun games like Dead Rising, Dead or Alive 4, Halo 3 (around early 2007), Enchanted Arms, Zelda: Twilight Princess, Phantasy Star Universe, Super Mario Galaxies, Sonic and the Secret Rings (origionally called Sonic Wildfire) Sonic the Hedgehog 360, and Condemned Criminal Origions.
    Do you have proof Microsoft will drop the price of the 360 by the time Wii comes out? Furthermore, a 360 with an HD-DVD add-on is the same price as a PS3, regardless of SKU.

    "Fun games" is entirely subjective.

    2. The PS3's hardware has so much high end technology that companies hardly wanna make games for it due to it being to hard to write them for it, notice how only a few Japanese developers are sticking with it? Konami, Square, Capcom (possibly just for Devil May Cry 4)
    Yep, it's hard to code games for the cell processor, but it's bold to say that "hardly" any companies want to make games for the system. "Hardly" any Japanese game developers want to make games for the 360. What's your point?

    3. Quite possibly the biggest thing of all. A lack of interesting launch titles. Sure early on people were pissing themselves over Metal Gear Solid 4.. oh but WAIT! It's not a launch title? OMGWTF I WILL STILL BUY ONE LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!1111ONEELEVENsmurfRE! All the cool games that will at least be somewhat fun for the 3 won't be out till at least mid-late 2007.
    What console in the last seven years has had AAA launch titles?

  9. #69

    Default

    Do you have proof Microsoft will drop the price of the 360 by the time Wii comes out? Furthermore, a 360 with an HD-DVD add-on is the same price as a PS3, regardless of SKU.

    November is close to the Holidays, plus the console's been out for at least a year, so a pricedrop is gonna happen. Besides, I think Teamxbox.com mentioned it a few times. And HD-DVD Add-on is just that, an Add-on, you don't NEED it to play any games.

    Yep, it's hard to code games for the cell processor, but it's bold to say that "hardly" any companies want to make games for the system. "Hardly" any Japanese game developers want to make games for the 360. What's your point?

    I meant native developers.

    What console in the last seven years has had AAA launch titles?
    The Dreamcast, XBox (Halo, Dead or Alive 3), and the XBox 360 (Dead or Alive 4, Condemned, and Call of Duty 2 *I don't even like WW2 games yet this game is awesome*)

  10. #70
    Slothstronaut Recognized Member Slothy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    I'm in space
    Posts
    13,565
    Blog Entries
    27
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erdrick Holmes View Post
    What console in the last seven years has had AAA launch titles?
    The Dreamcast, XBox (Halo, Dead or Alive 3), and the XBox 360 (Dead or Alive 4, Condemned, and Call of Duty 2 *I don't even like WW2 games yet this game is awesome*)
    Dreamcast pretty much had Sonic Adventure and Soul Calibur going for it. Great games mind you, but not the most stellar launch lineup overall. As for Xbox, DOA is a joke of a fighting game, and Halo is overrated on a good day. The Xbox 360 launch wasn't anything to drool over either (again, DOA, and games like Call of Duty 2 are better on the PC).

    I'll go on record as saying that the PS3 is the first launch lineup I've been excited about since the N64. I can name more PS3 launch titles I want or at least am interested in than I can Wii launch titles (or titles from any other launch in history for that matter), and once I start looking at titles coming out in the next year or so, the gap between them only grows. It's all personal opinion and taste, and my taste is telling me the PS3 will have more games I want than the competition.

  11. #71
    Banned MecaKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,002

    Default

    What console in the last seven years has had AAA launch titles?
    The Dreamcast, XBox (Halo, Dead or Alive 3), and the XBox 360 (Dead or Alive 4, Condemned, and Call of Duty 2 *I don't even like WW2 games yet this game is awesome*)
    Dead or alive does not qualify a AAA game.
    Ports do not qualify as AAA games.
    I've never even heard of Condemmed.

  12. #72
    Will be banned again Roto13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    On the INTARWEB
    Posts
    14,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yamaneko View Post
    What console in the last seven years has had AAA launch titles?
    Dreamcast had Soul Calibur, which was widely regarded to be the best fighter ever made (at the time). Xbox had Halo, which I don't need to tell you was a massive hit. Twilight Princess looks like it's shaping up to be amazing, not that I was expecting anything less from Zelda.

    So at least two, likely three.

  13. #73
    who-za-what-za! Slicksword45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    In antartica
    Posts
    700

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erdrick Holmes View Post
    3. Quite possibly the biggest thing of all. A lack of interesting launch titles. Sure early on people were pissing themselves over Metal Gear Solid 4.. oh but WAIT! It's not a launch title? OMGWTF I WILL STILL BUY ONE LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!1111ONEELEVENsmurfRE! All the cool games that will at least be somewhat fun for the 3 won't be out till at least mid-late 2007.
    So? You fail to make a point with this.

    Good games rarley come out when a system comes out. It's not untill developers know what to do with the system that good games start to come out. If you think the first few games that come out make or break a system, then videogames would not exiest right now.
    I LIVE!!!!! AGAIN!

  14. #74

    Default

    A bad launch dosent mean a console will fail. The PS3 line-up is strong, no doubt. It'll just take till around 2007, when the price drop happens, and all the strong titles are released, that the PS3 will dominate.

  15. #75

    Default

    Dead or alive does not qualify a AAA game.
    I hate to break it to you, but it does. You gotta PLAY IT to realize it. Beleive it or not it's very fun, you just gotta like games to actually like it.

    Ports do not qualify as AAA games.
    What ports did I mention?

    I've never even heard of Condemmed.
    http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/adve...ml?q=Condemned

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •