If the World was ruled by Women...

[bipper]

What about mood swings caused by female chemical make up, maternaty leave, and so on. Are these even considerable? I am no expert on that, just wondering.

Same to you. I can honestly say I hope you both burn in hell.

I plainly admitted to not being an expert in the area, and made point-de-question, so how bout stop with the insults? I am rationalising here, and using shown thinking. IF you dislike my opinion, try and change it, instead of telling me to burn in, hell :rolleyes2 ? Of course, that is if you know what hell even is, and beleiving in the inferenced religion, seems to bring you to a certain draw point that should remove you from your pedistal asap, or atleast show strong evidence, strong enough to bend the rules.

As for my point, periods are natural, and painful. I do not mean to shed light on em, but these sparatic changes do cause mood swings and chemical imbalance(At least compared to what they are used to). This causes a change in judgement, and can influence thinking. I never claim that men are not prone to mood swings, but we are certainly less prone on our socialogical scale.

My point stands, I wont be burning. Thank you.

[Denmark]

yeah, women do rule the world. it's the whole truth.

[black orb]

>>> If the world were ruled by women we would come back to the Inquisition days..

[Some Guy from CW]

Margaret Thatcher is often considered to have been a great leader

By who?!

[NorthernChaosGod]

Wow, this thread is askin' to piss someone off.

well... not to be sexist or somethin, but i dont think its such a good idea. Cause as you know, all woman are very emotional.
they could go into some despression and do somethin they would regreat, if you know what i mean? A womans mind works so much diffrently than a mans, since we were cave ppl, man would bring meat. He would take care of the group, that includes in the animal kingdom

Any person in office is going to be mentally stable. If you were president, would you be depressed. No. Would people vote for an mentally unstable person. No.

ps: i know men are doing horrible job, but at least we aint ready to push a button to destroy whole world, when somethin terrible happends to us and we wanna die..

The reason women don't rule the world is because they'd destroy it as soon as a period came around, if not sooner because the PM of Canada got the same shoes (That bitch!) or something equally bizarre.

I do not trust women with nukes.

That sh*t stops right there. That is the very sexist as*hole reason why women don't have equal rights in the USA. I...cannot...begin...to describe the idoicy of that statement. That women would blow away another country because of some shoes?!!? The 'women', if you could call the sluts that, that you are familiar with are a disgrace to our gender and make the rest of us look bad. You have to think logically, if your brain is capable. Which I doubt.

What about mood swings caused by female chemical make up, maternaty leave, and so on. Are these even considerable? I am no expert on that, just wondering.

Same to you. I can honestly say I hope you both burn in hell.

If they suddenly gained power, we'd be in deep. French Revolution style deep. But this time with access to nukes.

I'm truly dissappointed in you. I thought you would have been smarter than that.

Women are far too emotional to rule. They would probably let uch emotions get in the way. But, meh, I'm not saying they can't. Men can be just as emotional at women sometimes, but, eh... I'm not one for politics.

Everyone has emotions. Women's are no stronger than men's. I think slaughtering 12.4 million people because of testosterone levels that skyrocketed is very dramatic, isn't it? Very emotional, no?

btw, crackercorn. Go. F**k. Yourself. There's a special place in hell for people like you. Burn.

Lol, my statement was probably the worst and I didn't even get a mention.

[Vincent, Thunder God]

I would imagine that the balance in the world right now is good. Neither men or women rule singly, we work together. Either sex ruling absolutely would probably create a negative world. Nevertheless, I will say that if I had to choose between a world ruled by women only or men only, I would choose a world ruled by women only.

There would be less wars, that's for damned sure. A world without as much influence from men means that women, who have infinetly less testosterone and care for their children more, would easily mean less violence and more peace. There is always the chance that they would become repressive of the views of men eventually. A cycle of absolute power on either sides of a coin may start out well, but it won't end well.