okay let me break this [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] down for you.
Myth - "Firefox and Mozilla are the same thing" - Example
Nobody credible said that. He linked to phased. WHAT THE [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]. At no point does firefox or mozilla claim to be the same, only some kids on the net.
Myth - "Firefox and Mozilla are Not for Profit" - Example
Oh really? Show me the page where you pay for firefox or mozilla. Infact, show me anything that suggests that you have to pay for the better browser?
Myth - "Firefox has lower System Requirements than Internet Explorer" - Example
You moron. Firefox did not claim to have lower system requirement, it claimed to use less system memory (in your source)...Different thing retard...Infact, I've got the proof right here.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4.../mmk/idiot.jpg
Image removed due to obscene words, but you can still click the link to see it.
Myth - "Firefox is the Fastest Web Browser" - Example
Again, you can't quote the firefox website, instead, you quote somebody elses site which promotes it, yet with your little internet explorer requirements thing, yuo went straight to the smurfing microsoft website. Good job retard. Again with the bad sources.
Myth - "Firefox is Faster than Internet Explorer 6" - Example
This is hilarous. His little blurb about components not beling loaded at startup is bull[img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]. Why do you think that you can browse the web by open explorer.exe? ROFL.
Myth - "Firefox is Faster than Internet Explorer 7" - Example
Same [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]. Same components can be loaded at startup with no problem, infact, if they aren't, its just another case of bad programming by micro[img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img].
Myth - "Firefox is Faster than Mozilla" - Example
Again with the poor sources, on top of the fact that the research data was done by an independant source. Point to me where firefox claimed this.
Myth - "Firefox Achieved 10% Market Share in 2005" - Example
http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=3500691
My source shows 10+%... Throw mozilla in, and its as high as 13, so which one of us is wrong? Both of us. The sources aren't reliable.
Myth - "Firefox Achieved 150 million downloads (2-2006)" - Example
...even if you take off your [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] 20 million, thats 130 million downloads.
Myth - "Firefox Achieved 20% Market Share in Europe (1-2006)" - Example
Bad source, bad data bad target. It seems to me all your "myths" are comming from one pro-firefox website and your responses from various anti-firefox websites....
Myth - "Firefox is Secure" - Example
Yeah sure...130...what a load of [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img], again with your crap sources, hwoever, I do have myself a reliable resource, partners of symantec (you know...the worlds largest anti-virus corp....)
http://www.computerworld.com/securit...109278,00.html
Firefox: 17
IE: 24
again with your pro maths.
I'm not going to go on...your article is full of [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] and contains almost No valid remarks. Good day.