Deep See Research Facility

[BG-57]

I knew what you meant. I was commenting on Evol's idea.

But any single-digit system for years would become ambiguous beyond a ten-year span.

[Ryushikaze]

Agreed. Hence my assumptions.

[IceAngel]

If you do not bring Zell and just bring Quistis you won't have to fight any monsters until you reach Ultima Weapon where you can switch party members before the fight.

What?! are you serious?????
You mean I've been fighting annoying battles for all these years whenever I get to this point and I dont need to?!

[BG-57]

If memory serves, you have to fight your way down to the bottom of the Deep Sea Deposit (even with Enc-None), and the random encounters in the DSD disappear if you defeat Ultima Weapon.

And I thought Zell just lets you take a different path down the DSRC.

[Evol]

Wouldn't it make more sense, if we're bringing years into it, to arrange it as YDDD? IE: Year 4, Day 242

What about 3015 Found a strong energy field?Year 3, Day 015?

If memory serves, you have to fight your way down to the bottom of the Deep Sea Deposit (even with Enc-None), and the random encounters in the DSD disappear if you defeat Ultima Weapon.And I thought Zell just lets you take a different path down the DSRC.

Actually if you put the right code you dont need to fight monsters on your way down.I dont remember the code right now.

[Ryushikaze]

Wouldn't it make more sense, if we're bringing years into it, to arrange it as YDDD? IE: Year 4, Day 242

What about 3015 Found a strong energy field?Year 3, Day 015?

Yes. That is exactly how it would be.

[Evol]

Your idea is inconsistent,it could also mean YYDD or YYYD.

[Ryushikaze]

Your idea is inconsistent,it could also mean YYDD or YYYD.

Yes, it COULD mean either of those, but neither of those gives an accurate count of the day of the year, and makes them worthless as counting tools. However, how, exactly, is YDDD inconsistent?

[Evol]

I mean your idea can be alterable.

[Ryushikaze]

And? How is this a worthwhile criticism of any of the three possible dating methods I have espoused? Your method is equally alterable, but also suffers the burden of not being incredibly, I mean incredibly unwieldy.

[Evol]

And? How is this a worthwhile criticism of any of the three possible dating methods I have espoused?

So you dont like someone criticized you?

Your method is equally alterable, but also suffers the burden of not being incredibly, I mean incredibly unwieldy

Same with you.

I think there used to be a city in DSRF.

[Ryushikaze]

And? How is this a worthwhile criticism of any of the three possible dating methods I have espoused?

So you dont like someone criticized you?

No, I don't like when people try and criticize me without leg one to stand on.

Your method is equally alterable, but also suffers the burden of not being incredibly, I mean incredibly unwieldy

Same with you.[/quote]

At WORST, one of my three suffers from being unwieldy, and that's only if you assume we can't add digits to the front.

I think there used to be a city in DSRF.

Facility? Unlikely. Deposit? Possibly. Not like it's impossible, what with all the Lunar cries throughout time.

[yuno]

call FE lol.

[Evol]

No, I don't like when people try and criticize me without leg one to stand on.

You have to open-minded when someone criticize you.
For example you often criticize people without mercy.
You want someone apologizes to you when he/she insulted you but in other hand you never say sorry to the person you have insulted.

At WORST, one of my three suffers from being unwieldy, and that's only if you assume we can't add digits to the front.

We can assume anything if it comes to a theory.

Facility? Unlikely. Deposit? Possibly. Not like it's impossible, what with all the Lunar cries throughout time.

There's many old structures in DSRF.
The structures existed before those DSRF people discovered it.
Maybe Lunar Cry is an issue here but how can you prove it.

[BG-57]

Ryushikaze is actually using a valid application of the scientific method to evaluate this game:

1) If someone makes an unusual claim, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim. It's not of the job of the people hearing the claim to disprove it.

2) Many explainations for events are possible, but simpler explanations are more likely. That's known as Occam's Razor.

3) Valid evidence would include events from the game itself, an official book (like Ultimania), or creator interviews.

Speculating on ideas that are based on other sources can be fun, but are ultimately unproveable. However, some ideas are more likely than others.