Deep See Research Facility

[Ryushikaze]

NO,because You often tell [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img] about people that you dont like, you only look the negative sides about someone, using those negative sides on your purposes against them whenever you have a chance.
Want me to continue?

Well, I certainly want you to provide evidence of these accusations. While I admit that I don't operate with kid gloves, Ad Homming is not my style.

Glad to hear that.

Glad that you understand it.

Your trick accepted.

Shall we move on, then?

Not to you but to me.

I think we may have hit a language barrier here, but Sarcasm is entirely the domain of the one being sarcastic, since it is the art of saying something one obviously does not mean, usually with an obvious verbal or colloquial clue.

You tell me!

Except you're the one who was calling what I was doing 'demanding', so if anyone could tell how it is so, it should be you.

Of course your explanation is better than mine about yours.
I show you why it can be alterable.
Yours YDDD
Mine about yours YYDD

No, that's an example of a way in which it can be alterred. Not a reason why it should be. I can also give a reason why it should not. Being that it only has two "day" digits, it can only count up to 99 out of 365 days, or 9 out of 365 in the case of YYYD, which only has one. YDDD can only count to a total of 10 years (beginning from year 0 and ticking over to 1 on day 366, or using 0 to indicate year 10 if starting with year 1), but can very easily be adusted to count additional years by adding a new digit to the left. Slightly clonky, but usable without too much issue, and it guarantees no duplicate dating.

Meanwhile, your method MDDY has two issues about numbering. The first is that with only one month digit, you cannot express all months in the year. The second it also cannot count past 10 years, and adjustments for these (involving adding additional digits to either M or Y) will result in duplicate entries, for example, 10216 could either be Jan 2nd, year 16, or Oct 21st, year 6.

Without destroying the city?
Lunar Cry should destroy that city into ruins if that the case but you can see many buildings in DSRF are almost intact.

Not if the Cry does not impact the city itself, but causes the shockwaves which cause a cleavage of a rock plane, and a loosening of the city/structure.

Though, I have no idea why you would think an impactor would necessarily turn a city to ash, especially since it left several ruins mostly intact, and since when we saw it during the course of the game, there was nothing involved but repeated Kinetic Energy transfers.

"turn a city to ash" that is only a metaphora.

Noted, but you should probably try and avoid metaphor when trying to describe a mechanism.