Quote Originally Posted by ShlupQuack View Post
...wouldn't it be logical that not eating people so as not to contribute to their suffering isn't any better than not caring and eating them?
No, because in order to provide a logical argument it must first be grounded within practical reality. Dreaming up radical scenarios in order to prove a point against legitimate logic, i.e. eating vegetables does not make you morally superior and vice versa (in fact the moral question is off the table), is a waste of time and contributes nothing to the debate.