Bill Gates
Jack Thompson
Ken Kutaragi
Thanks!
edit: Wow, he really did go off on that judge!
Last edited by fantasyjunkie; 11-23-2006 at 09:17 PM.
Kutaragi and Gates have contributed a lot to the world. Thompson contributes nothing but hot air.
there was a picture here
Bill Gates will probably go down as one of the greatest philanthropist of all time. You can hardly say that no one likes him when he thousands and thousands of people he's helped would probably say otherwise.
Anyway, I don't really hate any of these people but my vote goes to Thompson cause he's an ass.
what did bill gates ever do?
I would probably go play video games or have sex (the usual) - Nominus Experse
my mom would be like "ve? yo te dije, el internet no es bueno."
"seriously, my mom tells me "que tu hase en eso el dia entero?" and im like "mami yo toy hablando con people" xD. spanglish, ftw." ~ liz
Thompson may be an idiot, Ken Kutaragi may not look through his speeches, and Bill Gates may blunder lots, but I don't know enough about any of them to decide who's worst/best. However, if this is a contest on who is most useless, I'd say Jack Thompson.
"It's an adult kiss...we'll do the rest when you get back." -Misato Katsuragi
[size=1]Soul Calibur r0x0rz my b0x0rz!
Actually... I don't wear boxers, but Soul Calibur r0x0rz my briefz0rz just doesn't have the same ring to it...
**Proud owner of the Mercedes Scar**
I picked Jack for being a nubtjob too. Bill GAtes..he created Microsoft :P
Actually it was Bill and his friends but he forced/backstabbed his friends out of microsoft so he could take control...and he may "donate" loads of money to charity...but how many celebs do you know that do the same thing to raise their public profile and are just doing it for selfish reasons?
So his motives makes his deeds less good? Whatever his motives are doesn't change the fact that he helps a lot of people.
everything is wrapped in gray
i'm focusing on your image
can you hear me in the void?
I don’t hate any of them, but I guess Jack Thompson has made me ugh here or there.
well i define something as good not by the actaul deed but by the motives....its like if someone commited suicide i would think "idiot!" but if they did it for the good of their country because they possessed military secrets i would think "Hero!" its the same with this....giving with no ulterior motive = "good!"......giving with a selfish motive = "arse!"