Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 59

Thread: 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 . . . 3

  1. #1

    Default 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 . . . 3

    I was actually just wondering if Final Fantasy and Final Fantasy II-III were released originally on the Famicom? And IV-VI were released on Super right?

    By this count, there would be three FF installments on each system that has ever come out and in all likelihood, there will be a XIV and XV on the PS3.

    This simply struck me as interesting.

    I wonder if they'll pull multiplicities with every new installment they create?

  2. #2
    Will be banned again Roto13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    On the INTARWEB
    Posts
    14,570

    Default

    You're just realizing this now? :P Also notice that the last game on each console is the best one. This is not opinion. This is fact.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roto13 View Post
    You're just realizing this now? :P Also notice that the last game on each console is the best one. This is not opinion. This is fact.
    I love you coz you're so full of [img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img][img]/xxx.gif[/img]. <3

    With all this compilation focus, I don't know if they will make it to XIV and XV or not, especially with development costs going up and such. We'll probably be stuck in the XIII world for many years to come.
    Last edited by LunarWeaver; 11-30-2006 at 02:43 AM.

  4. #4
    it's not fun, don't do it Moon Rabbits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,582

    Default

    Yes, I realized this.


    Roto: FFVIII > FFIX and FFIV > FFVI

  5. #5

    Default

    But aren't there two different versions of Final Fantasy XIII coming out on the PS3? One focusing on the female prospective of the story and then one with a male protagonist? I'm not sure because I haven't really read a lot about the game(s), but that is what I gathered with minimal information.

    Anyway, would you count those as two games or just one as they have the same numeral?

  6. #6

    Default

    You would probably cound XIII as just one. Since X-2 wasn't counted this time around.

  7. #7
    Will be banned again Roto13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    On the INTARWEB
    Posts
    14,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moon Rabbits View Post
    Roto: FFVIII > FFIX and FFIV > FFVI :bigsmile:
    No, you're wrong. No need to explain why, you just are.

  8. #8
    Old school, like an old fool. Flying Mullet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Napping in a peach tree.
    Posts
    19,185
    Articles
    6
    Blog Entries
    7
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Senior Site Staff

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moon Rabbits View Post
    Yes, I realized this.


    Roto: FFVIII = big pile of poo and FFVI > All
    I fixed it for you.
    Figaro Castle

  9. #9
    Hehehehehe NGU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The end of the Universe.
    Posts
    361

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roto13 View Post
    You're just realizing this now? :P Also notice that the last game on each console is the best one. This is not opinion. This is fact.
    VII was far better than 9

    Chick Chick BOOM

  10. #10
    Will be banned again Roto13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    On the INTARWEB
    Posts
    14,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NGU View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Roto13 View Post
    You're just realizing this now? :P Also notice that the last game on each console is the best one. This is not opinion. This is fact.
    VII was far better than 9
    Only in the minds of those who played it before any other Final Fantasy, good sir.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RiseToFall View Post
    You would probably cound XIII as just one. Since X-2 wasn't counted this time around.
    FF XI didn't came out on PS2 (PAL) but came on PC and XBOX360.

  12. #12
    A puzzling conclusion Jigsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    305

    Default

    Technically, the PS1 had Anthologies, Origins, and Chronicles, which were admittedly ports, but there was also Tactics. That may have been a spinoff sorta kinda, but c'mon now.

    I guess you could also say that SNES had FF:MQ, but let's forget about that.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonface View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by RiseToFall View Post
    You would probably cound XIII as just one. Since X-2 wasn't counted this time around.
    FF XI didn't came out on PS2 (PAL) but came on PC and XBOX360.
    I don't understand the point you're trying to make. What difference does it make what system it came out on?

  14. #14
    Will be banned again Roto13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    On the INTARWEB
    Posts
    14,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jigsaw View Post
    Technically, the PS1 had Anthologies, Origins, and Chronicles, which were admittedly ports, but there was also Tactics. That may have been a spinoff sorta kinda, but c'mon now.

    I guess you could also say that SNES had FF:MQ, but let's forget about that.
    The ports don't count. :P Neither do the spinoffs. Even Tactics.

  15. #15
    Old school, like an old fool. Flying Mullet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Napping in a peach tree.
    Posts
    19,185
    Articles
    6
    Blog Entries
    7
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Senior Site Staff

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonface View Post
    FF XI didn't came out on PS2 (PAL) but came on PC and XBOX360.
    No one cares about Europe though.
    Figaro Castle

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •