Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Flagrant self-promotion makes Baby Jesus happy!

  1. #1

    Flagrant self-promotion makes Baby Jesus happy!

    I was just browsing the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/">Wikipedia</a> and noticed that there is no entry for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EoFF">EoFF</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyes_on_Final_Fantasy">Eyes on Final Fantasy</a>.

    We must rectify this atrocity immeditately!

    I call upon you, my fellow EoFF members, to arms to remedy the situation by making the most bad-ass wiki page the Wikipedia has ever seen. In fact, it should be so awesome that anyone who beholds its splendor will suffer from burst eyeballs spewing concentrated awesomesauce all over their computer.

  2. #2
    Didn't it get deleted, like, a thousand times?

  3. #3
    Wasn't there one beforehand and then it got removed or something?

  4. #4
    I thought this had been discussed?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Tavrobel View Post
    Didn't it get deleted, like, a thousand times?
    Yes it did.

  6. #6
    If only these discussions could be recorded in some sort of...internet...database...?

  7. #7
    Recognized Member
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight
    1) Advertise EoFF (in a polite manner!)
    2) Contribute to the front site so more people show up
    3) Make meaningful insightful posts to draw people to the forums
    4) Wait for alexa to notice
    5) Upload eoff wiki to wikipedia.

  8. #8
    We should get one anyway. They say it's legit if you've been reported in a legit source, and EoFF's been in like... two magazines. Or something. And one of the subsites was in a prima guide.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Christmas View Post
    I thought this had been discussed?
    I think it has.

  10. #10
    I made one a really long time ago that got baleeted, which I undeleted until it was put up for permanant deletion

    And there's been plenty of attempts at it since. But hey, at least FF Shrine doesn't have one anymore, either.

  11. #11
    I never saw any of these other wiki threads.

    I wonder if we did cite those publications that mentioned EoFF they would let the page stay?

  12. #12

  13. #13
    Is it just me who laughed at "rectify"? Yes? Oh.

    Wikipedia is just not cool.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •