What the smurf is Andorra's problem? No, really. Throwing 11 men behind the ball...what the heck is the point in that? Damage limitation, somebody might say. No. They lost 5-0. What's the difference in losing 5-0 and 10-0? There isn't one if you're Andorra and going to come bottom of the qualifying league regardless. What they should've done is put every single outfield player on the goal-line with the keeper in front. It would've probably been more effective in achieving their aim, and it would be a lot funnier. Or maybe, just maybe, they could've tried attacking. What have they got to lose? It was obvious they would be thumped anyway.
As for England, how is it that Frank Lampard can be largely anonymous against Andorra of all teams?
Defoe does not convince me, and I'm glad we didn't sign him, as rumours suggested we might.
Speaking of unconvincing, Downing and Richardson. Neither have pace or can beat a man, and the only thing they offer is a left foot. Come back, Joe Cole. Please.
Wes Brown: What is the point? Now, that is a question which could be asked on any given day, however, in this context I am asking why he wasn't taken off for Andy Johnson ASAP, as it's not like Andorra were ever going to pose a threat. Nothing against him as a player, but a second centre back was unnecessary.
Even though we won 5-0, I'm extremely frustrated. It's all Andorra's fault. I say we nuke them, just for kicks.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
...Geddit?
