Because We don't post stuff like this, even hidden in spoiler tags. Don't do it again.
~Void
The minute you put a lawsuit up for ridiculous amounts of money in scenarios like this, it is not about the victims killed but merely about the money.
Lawsuits of this class are usually settled by the defendant paying the cost of defense. Which is the whole point of the lawsuit. For a few hundred thousand the plaintiff agrees to go away quietly, rather than loudly dragging the issue through a courtroom with subsequent exposure of the defendant to a potential large judgement (case merit not required), and/or bad media publicity. It's a form of extortion.
I'm in agreement with Samuraid on eveything here. The effect that video games have on a person do not, to me, seem to be enough to make people go out and commit these crimes. It may serve as "just another thing" in a long list of influences, but then so can books, music, and other types of media, as well as things in their life, any mental disabilities or conditions, and a host of other things.
As for the lawsuit, well, the part were they say Sony and Co. should have forseen that it would be copied seems pretty silly to me. How are they to know the mental conditions and life issues of everyone who buys their game? Placing the blame solely on video games is just stupid, especially considering the number of people who play videogames now.
Boy am I an unfunny ass.
People who say video games cause violence are making a common error for people who don't know statistics - mistaking a causal relationship.
It is much more logically plausible that violent people are simply more likely to play violent games. This kid who played GTA obsessively was, more than likely, a very prone-to-violence kid to begin with, hence liking GTA so much.
If you go nuts and kill somebody saying you learned it from a video game you're a fricken idiot and I think deserve extra jailtime. I've played violent video games my wholel ife, I've never killed somebody because of them. A game doesn't put a gun in your hand and tell you to go kill, you do.
now it's even worse if you say video games are the reason someone killed someone. So the game not only put the gun in your hand, it made you pull the trigger too? There are far more problems with the person than playing violent video games if they go out and kill someone. Where'd this 14 year old even get the gun? That's a problem in itself.Saying guns kill people is like saying your pen misspelled words. "Hey, looks like you spelled some words wrong."...."Oh yeah, I need a new pen.
THE JACKEL
add me, PSN: ljkkjlcm9
Jesus must have seen it coming. That's why he didn't whoop them guards with Christ Kung-Fu when he was being put on the cross. Then, he'd go on to heaven, and then he couldn't get sued.
Anyway, as for my take on this...
I will not deny that video games can affect people in negative ways. However, saying they directly cause major violence with children is not only foolish due to (insert piece of common sense here), but also because violent crime rates have dropped since the Playstation's release. Not to imply that video games STOP violence, but to say Video Games INCREASE violent crime rates in children is silly since they've dropped.
this is so stupid, some just kill Thompson.
Actually, following psychological studies, people who play violent video games tend to become more violent, but the relationship is more like smoking is to cancer; if you smoke, you're more likely to get cancer, but just because you're smoking doesn't mean you'll definitely get it.
On a lighter note, isn't it fun how Jack Thompson preaches against video games inciting violence, and then one or more people in a topic (on a video game forum) suggest murdering the guy, really clears the water eh?
mhmm, this could of happened just the same if he watched a movie of the same nature in the same nature of the nature.
Wow...
~Ye must desire respite from thy empty existence. Thou shalt have it.~