That's not freedom. That's called safety, and there's a difference.How freedom is defined depends on the person. To me, freedom is the ability to walk down a street without fearing who has a gun concealed on their person.
If you've ever seen any of viators posts, you'd have known that was a joke.Before Northern Chaos God declares "pwned" like an immature child, I would like to see a source to the truth of this statement.
Although, I imagine the amount of murders in those two countries are relatively similar, but I can't say for sure.
Although, I have been looking at murder statistics on the internet for the past 30 minutes or so, and I will say that they are not easy to come by.
Edit: Jeez this thread moves fast. Anyhow, I don't support gun ownership so that I can defend myself from some random criminal. The reason I support gun ownership is so that the government will think twice about stepping out of line. Guns should be easy to access so that revolutions arent hard to throw. I think fully automatic weapons should be legal for this reason. Although, I can't say for sure why I draw the line there instead of allowing personal nukes.
Reply With Quote