Hostel: Part II

[Dreddz]

but seriously though i hear its more gory than the first (SPOILER)something about getting a saw to a face and some unholy things done to "manly parts" lol

It isnt as gory as the first one. Nothing tops the eye gouge in this one. (SPOILER) But you did happen to mention the part where the man gets his penis victim to some untasteful scenarios, I found that part surprisingly graphic

I thoroughly enjoyed it, more so than the first. I dont get why some people loathed the first film, I thought it was unsettlingly awesome.

Because it, like almost everything else in the genre*, and like this sequel probably is, is a talentless exercise in using shock tactics and blunt, brutal methods of violence to effect the audience. It requires no effort, no thought, no insight, and no expertise. Anyone - and I literally mean anyone - can make a film like Saw or Hostel, because it's so freaking easy to unsettle people through depictions of torture. Even Hellraiser isn't terribly impressive, and that's a really well-made, well conceived horror movie that uses the trope.

Your in no posi<b></b>tion to be saying that anyone can make a film like this. Are you a film director? No. So how would you know. Maybe when your a multi oscar winning film director then Ill take your word to be true. And you comparing Saw and Hostel just shows you havent seen either of the Hostel movies. Yes, they both show explicit torture sequences but Hostel is more story driven, especially in the second outing. The fact that there are very few violent scenes in both Hostels should show that the film director isnt luring people in just for the gore. And the most unsettling aspects of Hostel arent the torture scenes, which you would know if you had seen them.

And Eli Roth talentless? You dont know what your talking about.