I had no idea this was that common, cool. All the more reason to ask the opinion of the general public IMO.
Seems fair enoughBob, but of course who you chose is also subjective. It seems to me that the Ciddies are a relatively democratic process, so I think it would be reasonable to involve everyone. That way, who eventually wins is actually decided in a fair manner, not by a minimum of three people.
In fact, one could argue it's not even fair to take any kind of revote, in which case the original tally could merely be listed as a draw and have two Ciddies awarded.
Either a full revote, or stick with the draw. Three people is better than one, but it's hardly close to how many people vote in total.Who's with me?





Who's with me?
