Looks like a lot has developed since I've been gone. Let me see what I can come up with.
You could have just answered the question instead of making drama, or you could have done both. It still seems a little strange to me that you seem to know everything right away, because I'm finding it hard to gather any definites. Geodude is citizen for sure, Kadabra is mafia for sure, Butterfree was suspicious for sure...? I'm not saying you're wrong, you could very well be right, but how are you so sure of everything 2nd day into the game?
That's a good point, I was tired and didn't think of that. Now I don't know what to think about my theory of two factions. Ironically, this point also goes against you, Kadabra, and makes me rethink a lot of my post yesterday. If there isn't two factions, then I can assume that the people who voted for Butterfree are definitely not mafia, therefore Slowpoke would be off the hook. Since I'm not sure about my two factions theory, I'm not going to vote for Slowpoke, because I think he can bring some valuable new perspectives if he is in fact a citizen, and I'm not willing to risk it.Originally Posted by Kadabra
Er... I think that's a bad way to go about things. That actually makes me a little suspicious of you. You want to lynch Geodude just to test? Geodude can definitely be a valuable citizen if he is in fact a citizen. Isn't that a little too risky?Originally Posted by Sandshrew
Additionally, what would lynching Geodude prove, exactly? If he's a citizen, Slowpoke would be right when he said that Geodude proved his worth to the town arleady, even though I still don't know how he's so sure. Still, it wouldn't prove that Kadabra is a mafia member, but it would make him a little more suspicious. If Geodude is not a citizen, then Slowpoke would be wrong in supporting him so adamantly and that might be something to look at. Still, it wouldn't prove that Kadabra isn't a mafia member. Lynching Geodude really wouldn't prove anything at all, except whether Geodude is a citizen or a mafia and by then it might be too late.
That is a good point, I've noticed that Kadabra has mentioned serial killers several times already. Why are you so adamant about there being a serial killer?Originally Posted by Slowpoke
Do you two have any reasons for voting? I think everyone should state why they're voting one way or another, in their own words, or else it will just seem like they're jumping the bandwagon.Originally Posted by Jigglypuff
How are you so sure there's three werewolves?Originally Posted by Slowpoke
Squirtle... you're voting for someone because they seem innocent? And you still haven't addressed my concerns earlier in the thread at all. It's not illegal to change your mind but you could address suspicions toward you and provide reasons for your own suspicions. This is highly suspicious to me.Originally Posted by Squirtle
Okay, let me see if I can summarize what I have so far.
I'm not going to vote for Slowpoke anymore in case he does have valuable information that we don't have and it's too much of a risk in case he is a citizen. I would like some of my questions answered, though.
I am more suspicious of Kadabra now as this has progressed, because he keeps bringing up serial killers and because of his apparent contradictions.
I'm a little suspicious of Sandshrew because he was urging us to lynch Geodude simply as a test, which I think would have been a bad move at this point in the game.
Charmander and Jigglypuff seem to be just jumping the bandwagon, and that makes me suspicious of them too.
Note: Charmander voted for Geodude last round and Jigglypuff didn't vote at all.
Squirtle's just voting and not providing any valid reasons.
At this point, I think I have enough information to go on where lynching an inactive would be counterproductive rather than helpful. My vote is going to be between Kadabra, Sandshrew, Charmander, Jigglypuff, and Squirtle.
I'd like to wait a little longer before voting to give you guys a chance to explain yourselves.






