I think he's at least telling the truth, his sanity is questionable.
I think he's at least telling the truth, his sanity is questionable.
And Snape, I seriously doubt that they would mae a random investigative role that is hardly used in mafia games, insane.
I'm hesitant to want to lynch someone based solely on one person's word with no other evidence. But lynching Snape would be worse, since if he's true, would just be doing the mafia's job for them. If you guys want to test Snape's roleclaim, lynching Dudley would be a lesser evil. At least we'd have a little more to go on than "just being annoying" like the current Myrtle bandwagon is.
Still, I'm sticking with my current vote for Hermione for now. She has been the most suspicious to me that I think is most likely scum.
Why don't we wait on any of Severus' role claims (as in roles he's claiming others have) until something credible shows up. Like him predicting one of us correctly?
Exactly. However, that's why I want to either lynch Dudders, or myself. If we lynch Dudders and he flips Mafia, the Doctor can protect me or whatever, or leave me to die by the Mafia. If you lynch me and I flip Town, Vig can night kill Dudders.
Ugh, I keep forgetting there is a possible vigilante/serial killer.
Voldy, what if I predict one of you as Mafia? You're not going to admit that are you?
It's not only being annoying. It's actively working against the town's ability to discuss and observe. I cannot question someone if 15 posts of her come between it. I need my mind at it's clearest with all these roleclaims.
But as I said before, I will go with the town on this one. If you all want Dudley, I will go for Dudley.
No, but if you predict someone to have a pro-town role and it's correct, then all of your other claims suddenly become valid.Originally Posted by Severus
Same, as long as it isn't me or Snape, for I want to see his credibility later.
However, I still think we need to get Myrtle.
If that happens, then we still learn your role.