There is so much wrong with this post I don't know where to begin.Originally Posted by Vost
It's funny how anytime the R=U theory is argued, opponents always use the phrase "Your theory has little to back it up I'm afraid," mostly because their own pathetic attempts to hold on to the version of the plot line that makes sense to them has no real or substantial arguments to eradicate the contrary.
The theory has an infinity of data to back it up, I'm afraid,. To boot, it explains the central villain most perfectly and wraps up everything that was not wrapped up. It is an implication done vaguely on purpose.
-V-O-I-D...whoops, I mean V-O-S-T.
1. If you don't actually have anything to back something up, no real conversation or facts besides the delusions cooked up by playing this game far too much, then yes, it is most likely WRONG! You can theorize that over the edge over the universe nothing exists but pink bunnies with carrots up their bum, just because we can't give hard evidence why it isn't there, and you can't give evidence why it is, doesn't mean it's true.
Your reasoning.. is backwards.
2. There is absolutely no data to back up R=U, that's why it's made fun of. If you want to wrap things up plot-wise with the image spinsels cooked up during your endless hours of triple triad, that's fine, but don't force it on other people.
3. How does it explain the villian in any way?
Ultimecia - wants to kill everything
Rinoa - doesnt want to kill everything.
The only thing we know about Ulti is that she wanted to be ruler of everything or kill everything or something like that, she is probably the least explained villian in the entire FF-series.
Reply With Quote