@Hemera Given the fact you call me a dick I'd love to take you to the underworld with me![]()
@Hemera Given the fact you call me a dick I'd love to take you to the underworld with me![]()
This is a stretch. Hera has never said you weren't scum, she just follows the logic that if Mafia has a Hurtlocker and you're the only bomb, you are either town aligned or neutral. If you were town aligned I think you'd be doing way more to save the town than you are. If town wins, all townies living or dead win. If you're neutral, you win if you survive. Which means you won't put the good of the town first (which you haven't), you'll put survival first (which you have.)
The bomb can also be neutral, and win by surviving. This would lead the bomb to prioritize whatever keeps them alive, and not prioritize town.
Also, Apollo lmao. Haven't you insinuated that I'm amateur? (You may not have, but I don't have time to go through ALL your posts atm.)
How is sacrifice scummy? If he flips scum and Hera takes the fall, ends up being pro-town, then you know I'm scum too. Scum ends up losing the same amount of players.
That's a bluff. And you've been way smarter than that all along. What gives?
Bingo. Though you could be bandwagoning to scapegoat me as scum because you know Apollo isn't scum, the town will LEARN from the next SEVERAL lynches and the next SEVERAL mafia kills instead of just taking it one day at a time. The town has the opportunity to make plans.
HOWEVER.
The fact that 2 players have now roleclaimed that they have bomb detection abilities really bugs me. Especially the one who claims to be bomb-proof, but unsure of how bomb-proof bomb-proof is? One or both of Hera and Hemera have to be bullting, unless there are like a kabillion bombs on both sides. Interesting.
What could be happening in paranoia land (Hades head) Apollo and Hemera are both scum and trying to get me to trade. A smart person, obviously, would insist at this point we take the risk of making the bomb-proof claimant the lynch-vote. That way we lose no town. What actually happens is the "smart" person tries to use this line of reasoning and the other scum and some town see "smart" person as a flip-flopper, they stop trusting me and possibly even lynch me.
I'm sticking to my guns.
And Nyx, I fail to see how sacrificing to see who is lying is scummy. If Apollo does turn out to be scum then that would make you scum as well since you're trying to scare us along with Apollo.
Technically I'm pro-town but ruffling the feathers of those that take this game much too seriously has become too much fun. Town is better off without me but things won't be half as much fun. Decide who's coming with me to the underworld already I need to sleep soon
It's safer for Hemera actually since she claims to be bomb proof. Vanillas are not bomb proof.
Yes, definitely let Hemera take the vote if we're gonna lynch him. If she's not as she claims then she's a dirty liar and she'll go poof anyway.
But Hemera could be bluffing, could she not? And Hera could be bluffing? or they could both be bluffing and trying to mislead the town into believing there are multiple bombs or superkill bombs.
The double bomb-prevention roleclaim has thrown a hink in our giddyap. I don't see Del Zeus nerfing the town that much, unless he's already stacked the deck against us in a bad way.
Argh.
In mafia it is very possible to overthink![]()
I think I'm letting my paranoia get the better of me. If the majority of the town agrees that it's better for Hemera to be the lynch vote then I will also agree to that.
I think Del said this would be fast because of Hephestus's role, but he was killed before he could use it. Bus drivers target 2 people. Drunk drivers crash cars. That would kill the 2 people he targeted and possibly Hephestus himself. Add that onto the two other nightkills and thats a potential of 5 in one night.
I already mentioned what Del Zeus said. If necessary, I'll go drag up the quote. But that bounced around my head for a great deal of time last night, I even wrote a sticky note on my desktop to make sure I posted it. Apollo's post reinforced it.
Thank you for the compliment on my intelligence though. I appreciate it.
Does someone else want to explain this? I thought it was a common concept.
I'll try and simplify it, not because I'm trying to be condescending, but because it might get to unwieldly if I make the model life sized.
Two mafia members. Mafia member A has a lot of heat. Mafia member B campaigns against Mafia member A and Mafia member A gets lynched. Mafia member B looks like a really great townie, he helped kill a scumbag! But really, all he did was sacrifice a teammate who looked like he was going anyway in order to make himself look innocent.
This is what I am suggesting. I'm not trying to scare anyone, I'm offering alternative outcomes.