View Poll Results: Favourite Party Size

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • 1 - I roll solo, baby

    1 11.11%
  • 2 - Me and my best pal is all I need!

    0 0%
  • 3 - A dangerous trio!

    0 0%
  • 4 - Well we needed a cook!

    2 22.22%
  • 5 - And someone to carry the water...

    2 22.22%
  • 6 - A cheerleader is always need too, right?

    1 11.11%
  • 7 - Just to make sure all the bases are covered

    1 11.11%
  • Bigger - Bring who you need, and then anyone else

    2 22.22%
  • 0 - I won't even party with myself!

    0 0%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Party Size

  1. #1
    Eggstreme Wheelie Recognized Member Jiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    26,942
    Articles
    65
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor
    • Notable contributions to former community wiki

    Default Party Size

    What's your preferred party size? I've been spoilt now and going to three member parties feels restricted and .

    How about you, what party size do you like best?

  2. #2

    Default

    I voted 5, but 4 person parties also work as well. I think those sizes give enough people to cover all the bases. Any bigger and it feels crowded. Any smaller and it feels restricted.

  3. #3
    Eggstreme Wheelie Recognized Member Jiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    26,942
    Articles
    65
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor
    • Notable contributions to former community wiki

    Default

    I agree with you entirely. I find that, on occasion, four-man parties make me sacrifice having an extra cool character. I plead and plead but have to make a choice

    That being said, you can still get the job done. Plenty of room for customisation that I just feel three-man parties are lacking. Anything smaller and it's just too difficult.

  4. #4
    Forehead Remon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sourdor
    Posts
    2,235
    Blog Entries
    12

    Default

    7, it's the perfect number.
    But I'm a party pooper so it doesn't matter.

  5. #5
    Back of the net Recognized Member Heath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    5,461
    Contributions
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    4 for me. For my RPGs and my shooters, it's the perfect size. Though I'm perfectly happy with 3 too.
    Not my words Carol, the words of Top Gear magazine.

  6. #6
    That's me! blackmage_nuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    8,503
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    For Rpgs with choosable parties: Number of playable characters divided by 3 with a leeway of +1 but nothing over 6 or under 3. Also any game with choosable parties should have atleast 6 playable characters.
    Chrono Cross had a terrible party size especially since one of the characters was compulsory for the entire game, they shouldve taken a leaf out of Suikoden's book.

    For Rpg's with unvarying or selfvarying parties: 3 or 4, I lean more towards 3.
    Legend of Legaia has huge nostalgia value for me

    Puzzle/Adventure Platformers: 2
    Portal 2 and Ico are some of the best games I've ever played

    Shooters: The more the merrier
    I dont play many shooters but I love a good 6v6 soldat game
    Last edited by blackmage_nuke; 04-23-2011 at 07:40 PM.
    Kefka's coming, look intimidating!
    Have a nice day!!

  7. #7
    Depression Moon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warrior Falls
    Posts
    6,050
    Articles
    45
    Blog Entries
    2
    Contributions
    • Former Editor

    Default

    Is this just talking about RPGs, FF?

  8. #8
    Recognized Member VeloZer0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,984
    Contributions
    • Notable contributions to Final Fantasy forums

    Default

    For RPGs 3-5 doesn't make a big difference to me, provided they are properly set up. If each character has to be more narrowly defined then you need more to fill all the roles in combat. If each character is more versatile then you need less.

    For SRPGs I strongly feel 10 is to many. (and also apparently the standard). With a party size like that your characters movement range is so limited you spend half of the level gridlocked by your own party. Just moving across the map is a chore. It also promotes lack of diversity in party composition. If I have 10 guys I know I am going to have to have 2 mages, 2 archers, 1-2 healers, 2 heavy melee, 2 light melee. (or close to). With less party members there is usually considerably more ability to mix them up, as it goes hand in hand with giving them more versatility.

  9. #9
    Eggstreme Wheelie Recognized Member Jiro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    26,942
    Articles
    65
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Editor
    • Notable contributions to former community wiki

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Depression Moon View Post
    Is this just talking about RPGs, FF?
    Any game, really. I had RPGs in mind, but then I considered shooters as squad sizes vary too. WoW has massive raids and that's pretty sweet I guess.

    EDIT: And Velo brings up a good point with SRPGs, I forgot about those lovely things.

  10. #10
    Skyblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Earth, approximately
    Posts
    10,443

    Default

    SRPGs can do wonders with larger parties. The Shining Force games had a standard of a dozen party members, but still worked brilliantly. Fire Emblem also has battles with large parties, yet the combat system is still fun. It's all about balance and level design. I'm not saying that FFT was wrong for cutting back to six party members (far from it, FFT is a great game), but larger parties can certainly work.
    My friend Delzethin is currently running a GoFundMe account to pay for some extended medical troubles he's had. He's had chronic issues and lifetime troubles that have really crippled his career opportunities, and he's trying to get enough funding to get back to a stable medical situation. If you like his content, please support his GoFundMe, or even just contribute to his Patreon.

    He can really use a hand with this, and any support you can offer is appreciated.

  11. #11
    Ray "Bloody" Purchase! Crop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    3 or 4 seems fine to me, I did like how FFX enabled you to bring anyone in through the battle. Granted it was only 3 at a time, but I think that system could be used more, maybe even with some adaptations.

  12. #12

    Default

    It depends on the size of the cast.

    WoW has massive raids and that's pretty sweet I guess.
    Clearly you've never played WoW.

  13. #13
    Recognized Member Jessweeee♪'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    i'm on a sandbar help
    Posts
    19,882
    Blog Entries
    12

    FFXIV Character

    Sarangerel Qha (Twintania)
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    3-4 is best. I liked FFX best in that regard.

  14. #14
    Forehead Remon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sourdor
    Posts
    2,235
    Blog Entries
    12

    Default

    7+ parties are sort of uncool because you kinda don't feel like using the rest of the cast. If they could arrange a system like FFX, where you can switch characters mid battle, then it would be fine. But in games like Persona or previous fantasies, I only leveled one main team and left the rest rotting in reserve.

  15. #15
    Recognized Member VeloZer0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,984
    Contributions
    • Notable contributions to Final Fantasy forums

    Default

    40 man raids in WoW were wicked awesome. (playing wise, not talking about logistics).

    I've only played one Fire Emblem game (one of the GBA ports), but I vividly remember after a few battles I determined it was a better strategy to just use two characters the entire game. And it work marvelously. And kind of dulled my interest in exploring the rest of the series.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •