Looks like it's time to argue.
All I'm saying is that there is little to no point in going after a one-voter for any reason that an inactive wouldn't qualify for.
As for stringing up inactives, it has worked before. I fail to see the whole mafia=active theory that had always existed. If we're going for someone known for relative silence, whether it be a one-voter or an inactive, we shouldn't be reasoning as why one's behavior would be more suspicious.




