The Gay Option

[Fynn]

Kind of irrelevant? Point is most vidjas are aimed at the gamergater demographic - white, straight and male - to the absolute exclusion of anyone else. It should be fairly obvious to all and sundry by now just how damaging that homogenous targeting has been.

And what's their excuse? "I'm not [x,y,z], so it doesn't need to be there."

But that was not my argument at all. I wholeheartedly agree that we need to extend the demographic of games. I used the rest of my post to point out how I think it's important regardless of my orientation and that I enjoy such options and really want them in my games. Please, don't twist my words into homophobic gibberish. I really do my best to support the LGBT community through my writing and I did my best to make my post positive about the gay option. So yes, to me it's relevant that you took one clause from my statement out of context to make me look problematic.

Let me spell it out clear now:

WE NEED GAY STUFF IN GAMES BECAUSE REPRESENTATION IS FRIGGING IMPORTANT.