Shaibana

I actually found the third one unplayably boring. Had to stop half way through, and am very glad I did so.

AC3 did deliver a full story, even if it was not a very good one. The Tyranny of King Washington is an alternate reality storyline, and locations like the Mayan ruins offer nothing to the story. I haven't any idea what the Benedict Arnold DLC is about as I played the Xbox version, though I can't imagine it would bring anything to the table storywise. I assume it's much like the Da Vinci Disappearance.

I agree though, 3 was not the best installment. I've actually just replayed it thinking I was being too critical the first time through, but it is truly awful. I think they tried to recreate an Ezio-like character, allowing us to live through Connor's life as it unfolds as Ezio's did, but it didn't work quite as well because Connor is not interesting in any way whatsoever. And I think because of that they skipped around too much. Sequences don't flow together very well and I was left scratching my head on more than one occassion.

At least they've managed to create a fun multiplayer experience this time around.

it was a finished story yes, but to my feelings it was very incomplete. all those additional story's just confuse me
maybe it was becaus the story was really short compared with Ezio's story's.
but there are soooo much DLC's that you have to buy to keep playing wich feels like EA keeps a hand in your wallet

I just felt it was extremely boring. It's set in a boring ass time period, focusing on a boring ass war (stabby wars > political wars). Hopefully 4 will be better, because PIRATES!, but I've shed all expectations of this franchise now.

well dnt get yr hopes up to much, becaus i felt the same way about AC3 but got dissapointed.