the start of the new war

some official british guy (wouldn't give his name) has claimed that the insurgency is iraq is backed by iran.

we all see where this is going don't we. "they suppoered 9-11" "they could get nuclear weapons" "they are bombing out troops"

what a convienent way to build this war up.

i always said we were going to war with iran and that's why we had the iraq war. (afghanistan and iraq before border iran and so giving two entry points).

but do we need to be so obvious about trying to start another war?

It's about slowly building up propoganda to the point where it seems normal. At that point, war becomes possible.

But come on, any intelligent person knows that the Bush administration wants to go to war with Iran. However, I don't know if they have the support to do it at this point. I certainly hope not.

The one place that SHOULD have its arse handed to it, is Saudi Arabia. God damned country has the western world by the balls.

It's no surprise that this is happening. I would say most people expect it.

Is anyone honesty surprised? Ive been expecting something like this for months.

Quote:

---

Is anyone honesty surprised? Ive been expecting something like this for months.

---

Years.

I swear I remember the Bush administration saying that they had no desire to go to war with Iran.

That was when I kinda guessed they would go.

Chaos

Kinda like how Hitler said he had no intention of invading the Czech's.

Quote:

---

Kinda like how Hitler said he had no intention of invading the Czech's.

---

Kinda like idiotic people make outrageous statements on internet forums. Wait...

We'll see you in two weeks for that.

~Void

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by War Angel

Quote:

---

Kinda like how Hitler said he had no intention of invading the Czech's.

---

Kinda like idiotic people make outrageous statements on internet forums. Wait...

---

Although most Bush/Hitler comparisons are moronic, this one isn't.

Edit: Never mind, I won't flame you back. I'll just warn you instead. *warns*

Quote:

---

Although most Bush/Hitler comparisons are moronic, this one isn't.

---

Every friggin' comparison to the darkest, most terrible reign in the history of mankind, is an awful and twisted one. By making such comparisons, you are disrespecting the memory of those that died because of that regime. I won't tolerate that.

Also, I didn't flame you. You chose to take what I said as a flame... your choice, really.

Quote:

---

Every friggin' comparison to the darkest, most terrible reign in the history of mankind, is an awful and twisted one. By making such comparisons, you are disrespecting the memory of those that died because of that regime. I won't tolerate that.

---

I'm not saying Bush is a Nazi or that he wants to kill millions of Jews, etc. etc. etc. I'm simply saying that the way hitler went about invading countries is similar to that of bush. Hitler said he did not want to invade Czechoslovakia, but he did. Bush said he does not want to invande Iran, but he does.

Quote:

---

'm simply saying that the way hitler went about invading countries is similar to that of bush.

---

Do you know of anyone who invaded a country peacefully? They all do it by force. So, saying 'Bush invaded Iraq the same way Hitler invaded X' is nothing but a pointless, provocative and offensive thing to say. Wanted to, didn't want to, said he would be didn't, said he wouldn't but did... it's politics. What you do means little, and what you say means nothing.

Well, not everybody goes about invading an entire region of the planet, country by country. Hitler did. If memory permits, napoleon did. Bush is trying.

yeah but the french made it really obvious......

and the germans had mein kamph........

and america has the npac......

oh yeah i see.