Yes, but with curses added for good flavor. I'm not a very imaginative person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Del Murder
Printable View
Yes, but with curses added for good flavor. I'm not a very imaginative person.Quote:
Originally Posted by Del Murder
Well, I guess I'll take comfort in the idea that however many conclusions I jump to, I'm at least a nice person! Gosh!
Oxymoron!
Literary? Literature?
Taking out of context! winnar am I! This is why he will argue what I say, once :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Tavrobel
Sorry, bipper, I'm not supposed to support you in any way, shape, or form.Quote:
Originally Posted by bipperTaking out of context! winnar am I! This is why he will argue what I say, once :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Tavrobel
Being nice is highly overrated. It's much more fun to be a jerk.Quote:
Originally Posted by rubah
Since we're going to tack on all sorts of fancy technical terms and elements of rhetoric, I claim ethos, pathos, and logos. While on the topic of fallacies, I select the association fallacy guilt by honor. Also, although not exactly a literary device, I select profanity.
I think I've covered my bases well enough now.
Well then can I claim d’Artagnan?
We aren't, that's what tavrobel was pointing out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ouch!Being nice is highly overrated. It's much more fun to be a jerk.Quote:
Originally Posted by rubah
Since we're going to tack on all sorts of fancy technical terms and elements of rhetoric, I claim ethos, pathos, and logos. While on the topic of fallacies, I select the association fallacy guilt by honor. Also, although not exactly a literary device, I select profanity.
I think I've covered my bases well enough now.
It would appear that my intention was misinterpreted.Quote:
Originally Posted by rubahWe aren't, that's what tavrobel was pointing out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ouch!Being nice is highly overrated. It's much more fun to be a jerk.Quote:
Originally Posted by rubah
Since we're going to tack on all sorts of fancy technical terms and elements of rhetoric, I claim ethos, pathos, and logos. While on the topic of fallacies, I select the association fallacy guilt by honor. Also, although not exactly a literary device, I select profanity.
I think I've covered my bases well enough now.
I would be a palindrome.
Or alliteration.
Or rhyme.
Take your pick.
You way support my out of shapeness in true form.Quote:
Originally Posted by TavrobelSorry, bipper, I'm not supposed to support you in any way, shape, or form.Quote:
Originally Posted by bipperTaking out of context! winnar am I! This is why he will argue what I say, once :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Tavrobel
I would be the Everyman who understands that wit is better left to the Fool.
I'd be a Blackadder-style extended metaphor.
Probably accompanied by some blatant innuendo that's delivered so innocuously that it sounds completely unintentional. I do that in real life sometimes.
on purpose, D?
is that kinda like the other night when I hit my cheek on a door and my mom said she hoped I wouldn't get a boner from it? rather, a black eye?
Yup, usually. If it's only a mild innuendo, then it's easy to get away with. It's quite out-of-character for me, so a straight-faced delivery can leave people guessing as to whether I actually intended - or even noticed - the dodgy connotation.Quote:
Originally Posted by rubah