Scientific Theories

Printable View

12-31-2010, 01:17 AM
Aerith's Knight

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShlupQuack

*hi5 AK*

Rantz just isn't used to seeing intelligent discussion outside of his beloved EoEO.

Dear diary,

A woman touched me today. It was glorious. Not to mention science prevailed.

It was a good day.
12-31-2010, 01:36 AM
fire_of_avalon

I thought I would like this thread and I don't really care about it at all.
12-31-2010, 08:04 PM
Raistlin

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShlupQuack

Though I appreciate that you're trying so hard to emphasize my win. Most people would just make a pathetic attempt to save face and move on (Raistlin: "Oh I was just doing it to piss you off ohohohohoho!").

Says the person who did exactly that in the first grandma incest thread. Stop projecting your own intellectual deficiencies onto my brilliant wit. Fatty.

For the record, she is right (for once). A scientific theory is not the same as a lay theory, and requires much more rigorous testing and consensus.
12-31-2010, 09:13 PM
Madame Adequate

Predictable thing about this thread:
AK is a high-and-mighty physicist

Unpredictable things about this thread:
Amanda demands rationality
Wes in agreement with Amanda

My world has turned upside-down :S

Here's my only contribution to 'science':
Our model of the universe doesn't work unless we invent dark matter. It would seem more in keeping with scientific rigor and Occam's Razor to look for flaws in our model, rather than inventing 80% of the physical universe.