Quote Originally Posted by Caboose View Post
You propose it was a hypothesis. It is a working hypothesis. You must now find partially refutable eveidence to push it back to a hypothesis so I win! For Science!!!!!!!!!
I assume that "so" is supposed to be an "or." Either that or you just confused the outta me.

You proposed that you had a theory; I corrected you to say it was a hypothesis. A "working hypothesis" is, shockingly, a hypothesis, and not a theory. You have conceded that your experimentation has gotten you as far as working hypothesis, not theory.

Though I appreciate that you're trying so hard to emphasize my win. Most people would just make a pathetic attempt to save face and move on (Raistlin: "Oh I was just doing it to piss you off ohohohohoho!").