Depends how we're comparing them. DA:O and ME1 are probably good games on their own. But goddamn it, I hate how they've taken the Black Isle-type of WRPG and kinda made it...worse. I know my reasons for not liking those two games are petty and maybe even pretentious (which I am with games in general I'd admit), but for a company that cites Baldur's Gate and KOTOR as its best titles, they sure do rely on relatively formulaic characters and mechanics.Bioware used to be worth their hype. They are currently pretty trout, however. Claiming that ME1 and DA:O are sub-par is ludicrous, you crazy, crazy Corgi. Obsidian are wonderful, though.
Now I admit it's been a while since I've played both series and I've played a relatively small amount of both games to be a credible source for a more objective analysis, but when these "masters of RPG's" can't invoke emotion in me, keep me immersed or even interested, then there's a problem. I know; my standards are likely far too high. I secretly wish for another Baldur's Gate or Planescape Torment to be made, but for now none of these "epic RPG sagas" seem all that epic, original, or enjoyable. I think hype is partly to blame for that, though.



Reply With Quote