Quote Originally Posted by chionos View Post
Listen, I'm not trying to be antagonistic here. Not everything someone says by way of responding to a thread topic is a direct assault on the op. You don't have to preface everything you say to me with "I never said that." I know what you said. I've reread what you wrote several times just in case I missed something. I thought this was a thread about voice acting, but when I try to defend voice acting you say you aren't talking about voice acting. What's the actual topic here?

I'm going to try to break this down so we can figure out why I'm confused.

You say voice acting has kept RPGs from achieving their goal of creating an immersive experience.
Last response from me,

If you aren't trying to be antagonistic why are you making things up that I said/claim? Here is an example: "You say voice acting has kept RPGs from achieving their goal of creating an immersive experience."

Except I never said that. All I said is that in my opinion it has made RPGs a little less immersive (as I don't get to personalize characters as much). Not even close to what you claim I said. I even talked about how FFX IS immersive, and that is a voice acted game...

There really is no point in responding as you just change what I write.