Members whose posts you always read.

[Psychotic]

This thread bored me and I just scrolled down to reply.

[Flaming Ice]

I always double check my posts like a good writer should!

(okay like any writer should )

[Loony BoB]

I don't think there is any one person I will always read the posts of. I tend to skim read depending on the length. Short posts I almost always read. Because of this I probably read a lot of posts by certain users. Then there are some users that I'll read the posts of because I feel I have a bond with them on some level. smittenkitten, when she bothers to show up. Shorty, DK, definitely. Maaaaaybe Rantz/Psy. Hard to say, really. Too many members to consider. D=

In older times there were certain members I would look forward to the posts of, but we had a lot more quirky characters back then. I'm talking about usernames such as Del Snizz, Wyllius and Nait. I probably still skipped through a bunch of their posts, too, but they were so quirky and "in character" at EoFF that it was always amusing to read their stuff. For threads, though, BOU wins that for me. I don't think there has ever been someone who made threads that would consistently draw me in as much as his.

Oh, Cid, too. Purely because it's Cid. It's almost cheating, really.

You know, I think it's mostly that in recent times I tend to skimread more, and also that I tend to read posts these days much more than I notice the usernames posting them. You could say I'm too interested in the discussion to worry about who's involved sometimes, or something.

[Denmark]

smurfing

eric (jowy to those plebs what don't know)

the fact he hasn't been mentioned yet means you're all wrong you gosh dang jerks

(yes this means i had to read the posts of everyone in this thread. i generally skim but get a good gist. i only post in and threads i care about going in anyway so it's less effort overall for me)

[Shorty]

Eric knows I read his posts!

[Denmark]

it doesn't mean anything unless you write it in a forum post

[Old Manus]

Sometimes I feel that my quality of life will be significantly improved if all I ever read were Cuchulainn's posts.

And Bert.

And Sephe-(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

[Shauna]

I dunno. I tend to read all posts, not singling out anyone in particular.

Probably because I have too much free time. Ask me again when I'm employed.

[Formalhaut]

I generally tend to always read smaller posts, and if it's an issue I feel strongly about I bump that up to all posts. I do agree with some others though: If I lose track of a debate in EoEo or something, I try and "resume" reading from the last few posts.

In terms of members, it does depend. If it's a thread I have started, I will definitely scrutinise each post, no matter who. In all other threads, if it's a friend, or someone I care deeply for, I will definitely read any and everything they have to say.

[Bunny]

I read my posts.

[Agent Proto]

I don't read any specific member's posts all the time. I read whatever posts that I come across that's not usually a wall of text. Though, I do end up reading what Iceglow has to say, because his posts are so unintentionally funny.

[NorthernChaosGod]

I don't read any of your guys' post all the time.

[Raistlin]

I never read anything any of you post, which I'm pretty sure is the only reason I have retained the tenuous hold on what little sanity I have left. I just have a list of preset responses and simply copy/paste based on the thread titles. If the thread title is ambiguous I just make fun of Shlup or Iceglow, which usually ends up being on topic.

[NeoCracker]

I think WK is the one I most consistantly will read. Though I try to read all comments in threads I'm interested in.

[Jinx]

I forgot to say: I always read Mercen-X's posts.