Clearly wanted to emphasise that bartz didn't have the cards.
Auron is ACCUSING
Attachment 53189Attachment 53190Attachment 53191
Is he right? Did he just win the game?
(SPOILER)
I'm sorry Jeff, but that accusation is incorrect . This disqualifies you from playing further.
Bartz is next. Bartz rolls a Attachment 53192 5.
I move to 113. That's about all I can do.
what kind of nation should we build? a good nation? a nation of plenty? a nation of muffled joy?
Lulu is next. Lulu rolls a Attachment 53193 7.
If one player has accused another, would this mean his cards are now shown to the remaining players? Can't really expect a disqualified player to hold onto cards.
Looked up the rules and apparently that isn't one. Suppose that when I played the game we did it to increase the speed of the game. What are your thoughts game master. Is the pace of the game going according to your expectations, or should we all see the cards to up the pace a bit?
False accusation means you just lose your turns, you can still refute suggestions
I suggest we do not reveal Protauron's cards, the fact he was wrong is still information about where the cards are not.
And then there is Death
What do you mean by refute suggestions? If a card that auron had is suggested Shion will PM a player that card. Alternitively if know those cards then we are closer to the culprit. I'm just considering that we are on turn 4 and its been 10 days.
Who's to say that his suggestion was all wrong, perhaps he geussed the location and weapon correct, but got the player wrong. A false accusation means nothing.
I think posting the cards from those who made false suggestions will speed up the game which will probably take several more weeks to complete at the pace we are going at.
That's what refuting means.
Turn 4 is not much, the game normally plays with 6 players max and 21 cards, it's normal it takes longer.Alternitively if know those cards then we are closer to the culprit. I'm just considering that we are on turn 4 and its been 10 days.
Yes, it does. It gives you one completely valid clause you can add to your deductions. Since it may not be obvious for everyone, the clause you can add is:Who's to say that his suggestion was all wrong, perhaps he geussed the location and weapon correct, but got the player wrong. A false accusation means nothing.
"At least one of the three cards suggested is not in the secret file."
Negative information IS information.
If I didn't think Proto lost on purpose (you can suggest and immediately follow up with an accusation if no one contested, there's no reason not to do it), I'd even work with the assumption he has neither of the three cards.
Oh it will, any information given -- positive or negative -- will speed up the game. I'd say we are about halfway done now, the past weekend was particularly slow because of Easter, hopefully it'll speed up now.I think posting the cards from those who made false suggestions will speed up the game which will probably take several more weeks to complete at the pace we are going at.
And then there is Death
I am fine not seeing them. :3
I feel like endless and I will continue to nip at eachothers heel on the issue, so I'll recap my main argument for showing the cards:
I feel the game is running slowly as we are on day 10 and only at turn 4. Showing the cards for players that suggest incorrectly can speed up this process. Despite seeing one card on every turn so far, I still feel like I am several turns away from making an accusation. At our current pace I feel that the game could run well into May. We still have the information that at least one of the cards he accused is incorrect.
Endless, Would you mind summing up your argument for not showing the cards of the disqualified players? We'll let the other players decide what their thoughts are.