There has been one thing I just couldn't get over after first playing and beating XIII-2 several months ago. It was brought back to my attention by my finishing the XIII Trilogy and then I decided to make a thread on this because of the X-2 Rocks topic.
That thing on my mind is how alike these two games are. First, notice how radically different the two games are from their previous installments. X and XIIi were incredibly serious games, melodramatic one might even say. They were also extremely linear in order to keep you completely engrossed in the narrative. Then here comes X-2 and XIII-2, both of which throw linearity out the window and more or less let you go anywhere you want. X-2 opens up faster than XIiI-2 but XIII-2 is still infinitely more expansive than XIII. Second, there was the tone of both of these games. As I said, X was very dark and depressing and XIII had barely any levity or comedic relief at all. Then comes X-2 which is a portrait in absurdity and makes no apologies for it. If anything, just like how XIII was even more super-serious than X, XIII-2 is even more super-ridiculous than X-2. You really do get a sense of whiplash going from X to X-2 or XIII to XIII-2.
Of course the exact details of X-2 and XIII-2 are worlds apart. I just think both games were designed with the same essential philosophy in mind.
And so we come to the topic. Which game do you think did its philosophy better? Which game do you like more and why?