Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: Nier Automata

  1. #16

    Default

    This game quickly became an emotional roller-coaster after the first playthrough.

    There were plenty of moments that left an impression whether positive or negative, but I found the underlying philosophical and psychological foundation the most appealing and intriguing. It might have been because I previously studied psychology as a major that I immediately gravitated towards Nier: Automata, but it definitely did not disappoint in those aspects.

    Ever since playing it, I have recommended it to everyone who was looking for a solid story-driven game, even though it might be better understood and complemented by the Drakengard series or the original Nier.

    Though it might be my selfish desire to discuss these philosophy and psychology with another gamer (ー_ーゞ

    So many feelings and emotions for this game even after finishing it!

    Quote Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
    Drakengard 3 is the chronologically first Drakengard storywise and the latest Drakengard titled Drakengard. That is why I mention it. Also it has the most redeeming gameplay in comparison to 1 and 2 and the main character and the story is just wy more recommendable, I'd say. Drakengard 1's gag ending is the timeline of Nier. So in direct relation to Nier of course Drakengard 1 is "kind of" relevant. Especially considering a certain sickness that sets everything in motion comes from Drakengard. Drakengard 2 is "just there". It is part of Drakengard but does not even have anything to do with Yoko-san - but that does not mean anything. I am not one of those people with abstruse claims that if director x is missing it is not canonical because my magical fan rules say that.

    I have not played the previous Drakengard games and only have experience with D3.

    The story, and particularly the characters, were...unique and interesting which helped to keep me playing.

    Though last I remember, the gameplay was lacking, in my opinion. That might stem from my lack of experience with hack-and-slash type of games or having not played the previous ones.

    Regardless, the game left a distinct impression and it helped appreciate everything else Taro has worked on.

  2. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raine Lockehart View Post
    This game quickly became an emotional roller-coaster after the first playthrough.

    There were plenty of moments that left an impression whether positive or negative, but I found the underlying philosophical and psychological foundation the most appealing and intriguing. It might have been because I previously studied psychology as a major that I immediately gravitated towards Nier: Automata, but it definitely did not disappoint in those aspects.

    ...

    Though it might be my selfish desire to discuss these philosophy and psychology with another gamer (ー_ーゞ
    That's a big problem of Nier 2 though. The game wakes up questions for people that are not really psychological and philosophical for the very reason that existentially there are already self-explanatory answers. Yes, when it comes to in-universe they can re-define whatever they want. For true things it would not work though. There is no necessity of questioning consciousness and existence. We are the consciousness. It is our instance to perceive reality. It is us. The rest, the shell, the personality, everything, is just something that "gives us shape". That is why a clone will never be us. He has his own instance to perceive reality and only a cloned body with ME projected into it, so my consciousness could be me. No second person, just a new shell. Only this way or a copy.

    Do not get me wrong. I love Drakengard. Nier 1 is my number 2 favourite of all time. But there are discussions that just are not necessary because the answer flat lies there. And the moment it is spoken out these things quickly become pseudo-philosophical then. Nier 1 never took that approach of existence but the obvious stuff about existence did still help a lot to answer a few other things people talked about in Nier 1.

  3. #18
    Memento Mori Site Contributor Wolf Kanno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Nowhere and Everywhere
    Posts
    16,839
    Articles
    55
    Blog Entries
    17
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Just Platinum this tonight with Ending E being the final trophy besides the actual Platinum trophy. Quite an interesting game which is a given from this particular studio. While the erase your data trick was more impactful in Nier, the actual challenge and fourth wall breaking involved in getting Ending E was a pretty neat concept on par with their previous efforts.

    While the combat is certainly a step up from past titles, it's still not what I would call fantastic, of anything, the sheer variety with the bullet hell elements probably saves it from being a more dreary experience. Course people play Drakengard/Nier for the cast and plot, and this game is certainly worth the purchase. Some thought provoking themes, a pretty likable cast of characters, and the usual quirkiness and genre subversion the developers are known for made this pretty fun overall.

    I think my two favorite joke/bad endings were the ones where you blew up the Bunker, ate a Mackeral, or when 2B ditched the mission to go fishing. Favorite Weapon Stories were for the three Beastlord weapons involving the three Royal Sisters and the ones that were callbacks to Nier and Drakengard. Great soundtrack as well. Will be interesting to see where a sequel would go from here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •