Oh.
Looks like I have some research to do on this role.
Day 1
Dwight D. Eisenhower (5) - Thomas Jefferson, Barack Obama, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt
Bill Clinton (5) -John Adams,Ronald Reagan, FDR,Theodore Roosevelt,Jimmy Carter,Taft, George Bush Sr., Richard Nixon, Dwight D. Eisenhower
Theodore Roosevelt (3) - John Adams,Dwight D. Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter
Taft (1) - George W. Bush
Barack Obama (1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Day 2
Bill Clinton (1) - George Bush Sr.,Thomas Jefferson,
Thomas Jefferson (2) -FDR, Abraham Lincoln,Barack Obama,Taft, Theodore Roosevelt
Teddy Roosevelt (5) -Ronald Reagan, John Adams, Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush,Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson, FDR
Nixon (1) -FDR,Theodore Roosevelt, Taft
Ronald Reagan (1) - Andrew Jackson
George W. Bush (1) - Barack Obama
FDR (0) -Thomas Jefferson
Jackson (0) -Reagan
JFK (1) - Bill Clinton
-----------------------------------------------------------
Make what you will of this.
Hmm? Maybe it's a role that requires constant attention by making a certain degree of outrageous posts? Whatever, I dunno.
So...these people willingly voted for a townie? Well, looks like we need to press them.Originally Posted by FDR
Alright, my speculations on Jefferson's role is he was a survivor. He didn't care who won, just to be alive. In addition there was also the requirement to be in the spotlight as much as possible. Hence the actions we have seen from him day 2.
I think Jefferson was neutral anyway. Washington said his name was white for a reason, and being neutral is the only reason I've thought of. And I agree with Jackson, perhaps he was a Survivor-type role.
I realise Roosevelt is dead now guys, just thought I'd share.
I agree with Andy and Barry, a Survivor-type role seems more plausible considering Survivor is one of the few roles with no actual color scheme. (That I know of.)
So, to Obama, Andy, and Abe, why did you wait so damn long to wait out for a vote change only to never change a vote when you could have easily changed for time and convenience's sake the day before yesterday? We were delayed by over 30 minutes and it seems like it would be easier. And, none you fellows EVER voted for Teddy the next day, considering over the course of two days, several people never voted for each other, including Teddy, we could use this a reasonable evidence to convict you to be an anti-town group, or rather, the SCUM.
Explain, if you will.
You're talking about day 1? I'm confused as to when you mean.
Both Day 1 and Day you guys held on to a 30-minuted tie to lynch a townie Day 1 and never voted for each other both days.
I was going to vote for Roosevelt after Bush Jr's post, but that would have looked awfully scummy after the argument I had defending Bush Jr earlier. I thought that either Jefferson or Roosevelt would be lynched, both of them I would have voted for.
I've broken a tie before, in Futurama Mafia. The day after had me lynched. It's not something I want to go through again unless I'm positive the guy is scum
Yeah, the role of survivor really is the only one that makes any kind of sense.
Alright, I'm giving up on Clinton. I still say he's a bit fishy because of his lack of anything of importance period to say, but it's not enough, to be honest.