Quote Originally Posted by Loony BoB View Post
As for "Why do a sequel, they could do a trilogy" - well, SE do a group of games and they are slated for it, now you're slating GTA for doing the opposite? If it's a GTA game, it deserves to have "Grand Theft Auto" in the title. If it's in a new location then they have every right to name it GTA V.
I doubt I really need to explain it to you, BoB. In the case of numbering, I feel a GTA has to live up to that title, use a new engine, or be a leap instead of an iteration of the previous games. This is what they did last generation - GTA III, Vice City, and San Andreas. The GTA III trilogy. Each built up upon the previous one, but the real leap didn't come until GTA IV.

I mean with FF and GTA, what they're numbered and how the franchise expands, we're kinda comparing apples to oranges here and I feel that should be obvious.