no the point i was making here, is that you implied by agreeing with you, that my credibility would improve. i put it to you that my credibility is better for disagreeing with you, or just generally better anyway. and by agreeing with you i'd be on a slippery slope.
irrelevantThis is true, based on the nature of what canon is. However, it is bad form that you've basically reduced this entire discussion to sound bites devoid of proof.
rufus lives, sephiroth now enjoys black lipstick, lots of other concepts have been altered but i can't be arsed going through each one because it means i'd have to watch that nightmare over againQuite bad form, as this is an unsourced claim, not an established fact.
k i will. the story of advent children, in places, does not follow correctly from that of FF7. i don't have the time, nor am i bored or lonely enough to go around digging up the details, anyone who has seen AC KNOWS THIS IS TRUE even if they LIKE IT. therefore, the changes are "RET CON"This is also a claim. You need to support this claim.
you sir, are one of the most arrogant and patronising human beings i have ever had the misfortune to disagree with on the internet. do you have credibility? how? who gave it? do they have it themselves to give it? do not be afraid of the answers.See, you're getting into emotional appeals again. You're supposed to be avoiding those.
hahaha. you're a classic, mate. go get laid. there is no rulebook for that, though.. might find it difficult.Because, y'know what? It usually smegging isn't. Opinions mean jacknext to hard data. Your entire argument thus far has been based on emotional appeals to how you'd like it to be, rather than what the facts are saying. Even your "established facts" are emotional appeals, claims without substance, and veiled character attacks.
anyway no more personal wars in this thread, i'm out bye. you can have the last word, i'm sure it'll be boring.