Sure, I could go the easy way and vote for that crazy boy Laddy. But it seems a little too easy. If he really does have that role then it's an investigative role and should not be cast aside so easily. So let's look at one of the people who has their vote on Laddy, someone who is no stranger to mafia tactics.
Then after I presented an argument and voted for Celes, he presents a similar argument and votes for Celes.
We also both didn't find qwerty suspicious. And here's more:
Most of the rest of his posts today have been focused on Laddy. That itself doesn't really send up a flag, as Laddy pretty much made himself the focus with his role claim. But what about all this 'I suspect people who agree with Del Murder, yet I agree with Del Murder on almost everything'? Yes, it could be that we just have the same opinions. After all I came up with them and I stand by them. It is not unreasonable for an intelligent person to also do the same. The 'suck up to Del Murder' argument naturally piqued my interest when he first made it so I kept an eye on him. It just seems odd that we agree so much after he specifically called out those who agree with me.







