Dying star?

[Serapy]

You're admitting that this 'reference' is not meaningless? Finally!

No. Because the 'star' you refer to is not one Rinoa points at.

I'm not talking about that star in the picture.

This proves that the star is dynamic based on time periods and thus Ultimecia's time period is about millions of years later, hence the star dying.

Or, it proves that airborn particles can cause light to be different colors.

We cannot detect neutrons, but we can detect airborn particles?

I don't know why you would want to argue against this. Because if it's actually millions of years later, it would be utterly impossible for Rinoa to reach to Ultimecia's time period.

This has nothing to do with 'want to', I argue against this because it's asinine.

*gasp* You actually like the R=U theory?

You didn't provide evidence that it's meaningless, either.

I don't have to, child. You have to provide evidence that there is meaning, first.

No, I don't. Because this isn't a theory. On the other hand, if you want to dismiss the discussion and make it become nonexistent, your counterclaims must include evidence!