Quote Originally Posted by Lone Wolf Leonhart View Post
I always have a hard time answering these. I have this really irrational fear of "hurting the games feelings". It doesn't make sense.
I get that, I'm the same way with certain inanimate objects.

Quote Originally Posted by Lone Wolf Leonhart View Post
Although to add something to the conversation, I'll say that I've heard E.T. for the Atari and Superman 64 for the N64 are universally panned as being god awful.
I never played ET for Atari but I know what you speak of with Superman 64. My only accomplishment is getting farther in that game than the Angry Video Game Nerd did, but that isn't much to brag about.

Quote Originally Posted by Shauna View Post
Anything from the atrocious Legend of Spyro series. They turned it into a brawler/beat-em-up style game. I don't know why they did this. What was wrong with the original Spyro way of doing things? Gone is collecting gems and other things. Gone is interesting level design. Everything is just dark and gritty, you could say. You can run out of fire breath. I don't even understand.

What makes these worse than the other PS2 entries to the series? I don't know. Enter the Dragonfly was broken, which made that bad. A Hero's Tail just wasn't very engaging. They just lacked the charm Insomniac brought to the series, I think, but they tried. The Legend of Spyro just disregards charm and tries to make something.... I don't know. It just makes me mad. xD
Is that the one where they redesigned him and made him look terrible? Because I had a feeling that was going to suck from the get-go. You run out of fire breath? I don't even.

The first three games are classics and I refuse to acknowledge anything after that.

Quote Originally Posted by Formalhaut View Post
I think many of the latter Crash Bandicoot games can be counted as pretty poor as well to be honest.

All our lovely retro mascots, having their name driven into the mud!
The same goes for Crash.