So me and Teepo had a think, and we feel, catching up from the start of Day Two:


  • Depending on the game balance, it is definitely feasible for there to be a Jailkeeper instead of a Doctor. No-one is a Vanilla, so the non-traitors might have more power in the passive and active roles than we might think normally. It's impossible to prove, and I'm not going to concern myself too much with what happened last night. At the very least, 'two roles countered each other' is a pretty vague statement to hinge too much on. I severely doubt the traitors tripped over themselves.



  • Raven's initial speculation on the traitors tripping over themselves is a little unusual, but he's been useful enough and been trying to assist us. Not enough for me to think he's highly suspicious, anyway.



  • I'm going to have to disagree with you Rowen, sorry! I know you're a master tactician, but I can see a certain kind of benefit with Velvet's 'itemised summary'. While it is possible that Velvet might me scattershotting suspicion to multiple people, an itemised summary does make it easier for people with short attention spans like Teepo (Hey!) to keep up.


I'm a little confused by this statement of yours, Velvet:

Quote Originally Posted by Velvet
If there's a Jailor, they might have prevented a night kill from a potential Godfather.

If there's a Doctor, they may have prevented a kill and know who's town.

Specifically, what makes the Jailor scenario mean the may have prevented a night kill from a Godfather? Couldn't any traitor have made the kill? Maybe I'm missing something. Apologies if I'm bothering you!



  • Mikleo's skit doesn't give away much. Losing the enabler would've been bad anyway, so finding out someone would love their bulletproof passive is not a shock. And I'd be astounded if the traitors failed a night kill three times in a row. I'd be happy, but astounded. And they can't cheat either.



  • Pascal's idea that the cancellation was separate from the failed night kill is plausible. It'd be very unlikely for it to connected, that seems really unlikely for two-four or however many people to target. Also bear in mind that there might be an ascetic character which would effectively cancel out everything but a night kill, so there's a possibility.



In regards to using skits, Rita does make an interesting point. Those who still have active skits to use up are likely prime targets for traitors to try and lynch. As long as the number of skit-abstainers is a majority of non-traitors, it isn't so much of a problem, but after a certain point that pool of candidates is going to start looking small. I'm strongly considering using mine, as I'm scared of the dark!

I believe three people have now used skits? Pascal, Anise and Mikleo? Am I missing anyone out in particular? I agree the skits will probably grow in usefulness as the game goes on and we can figure out what they all mean.

I'll consider my skit. For now, I will:

[##VOTE: Mikleo]

His silence has not gone unnoticed. What I find strange is that he's never been completely absent, but he's barely contributed anything. He activated his skit at the most convenient time - right after someone else - so he got his out the way. If I was a traitor, with a skit that I should use because it'd be suspicious if I kept holding onto it, that'd be a good time.

But mainly the silence. If he actually puts some effort in I might reconsider.

These Seraphs. So lazy!